django-celery-results
Celery result back end with django (by celery)
django-celery
Old Celery integration project for Django (by celery)
django-celery-results | django-celery | |
---|---|---|
4 | 3 | |
650 | 1,514 | |
0.8% | 0.0% | |
4.9 | 0.0 | |
8 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
Python | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
django-celery-results
Posts with mentions or reviews of django-celery-results.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-07.
-
Use Celery with any Django Storage as a Result Backend
The Celery package provides some number of (undocumented!) result backends to store task results in different local, network, and cloud storages. The django-celery-result package adds options to use Django-specific ORM-based result storage, as well as Django-specific cache subsystem.
-
Processing input and letting user download the result
To keep track of task result
-
Celery filter by periodic_task_name
The field is referenced in the docs here: https://github.com/celery/django-celery-results/blob/9b7deb464b0f3fa8c063a1cc70f9fc48829f9793/docs/includes/introduction.txt, and that appears to be accurate, but I don't have any experience with d-c-r personally so I can't really help much more. Hope you figure it out!
-
Celery-Django-Results won't post Task results from Celery
Hello, I have been having issues with Django and sending the results of Celery workers. Celery works and produces the results and if I set the backend to the redis server, it works fine. The issue is that Django ORM is not registering the TaskResults. I have tried everything under the sun in regards to configuration and I am sure that it's not the issue. I have found this Github: https://github.com/celery/django-celery-results/issues/102
django-celery
Posts with mentions or reviews of django-celery.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-15.
-
3% of 666 Python codebases we checked had a silently failing unit test
https://github.com/ansible-community/ara/pull/358 https://github.com/b12io/orchestra/pull/830 https://github.com/batiste/django-page-cms/pull/210 https://github.com/carpentries/amy/pull/2130 https://github.com/celery/django-celery/pull/612 https://github.com/django-cms/django-cms/pull/7241 https://github.com/django-oscar/django-oscar/pull/3867 https://github.com/esrg-knights/Squire/pull/253https://github.com/Frojd/django-react-templatetags/pull/64 https://github.com/groveco/django-sql-explorer/pull/474 https://github.com/jazzband/django-silk/pull/550 https://github.com/keras-team/keras/pull/16073 https://github.com/ministryofjustice/cla_backend/pull/773 https://github.com/nitely/Spirit/pull/306 https://github.com/python/pythondotorg/pull/1987 https://github.com/rapidpro/rapidpro/pull/1610 https://github.com/ray-project/ray/pull/22396 https://github.com/saltstack/salt/pull/61647 https://github.com/Swiss-Polar-Institute/project-application/pull/483 https://github.com/UEWBot/dipvis/pull/216
-
Database character sets and collations explained – why utf8 is not UTF-8
> they would now need to store max 4N bytes, which (with a high N) can exceed internal limits such as maximum length of an index key.
Specifically, indexes are limited to 767 bytes (some say 768?), which means 191 utf8mb4 characters. So your otherwise-innocuous VARCHAR(255) primary key breaks. I’ve seen this multiple times, e.g. django-celery probably still has this: https://github.com/celery/django-celery/issues/259.
-
Django API Text Processing?!?
For small projects you'll be fine just doing it in the view. For bigger projects you would want to use a task scheduler like Celery and with django-celery to distribute the workload in the background.