dicom2stl VS buttervolume

Compare dicom2stl vs buttervolume and see what are their differences.

dicom2stl

Python script to extract a STL surface from a DICOM image series. (by dave3d)
Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library
Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
nutrient.io
featured
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
dicom2stl buttervolume
1 4
202 86
1.5% -
6.2 5.8
6 months ago 3 months ago
Python Python
- Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

dicom2stl

Posts with mentions or reviews of dicom2stl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Hip implant modeling
    1 project | /r/3Dprinting | 15 Jun 2022
    All that said, there is a GitHub project that comes up in a rudimentary search, using Python to convert the file to separate STLs for each ‘layer’. This isn’t an endorsement, just acknowledging it exists. https://github.com/dave3d/dicom2stl

buttervolume

Posts with mentions or reviews of buttervolume. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing dicom2stl and buttervolume you can also consider the following projects:

pydicom - Read, modify and write DICOM files with python code

volctl - Per-application volume control and OSD for Linux desktops.

isosurfaces - Construct isolines/isosurfaces of a 2D/3D scalar field defined by a function.

NURBS-Python - Object-oriented pure Python B-Spline and NURBS library

meshio - :spider_web: input/output for many mesh formats

Kubernetes-Volume-Autoscaler - Autoscaling volumes for Kubernetes (with the help of Prometheus)

DicomToMesh - A command line tool to transform a DICOM volume into a 3d surface mesh (obj, stl or ply). Several mesh processing routines can be enabled, such as mesh reduction, smoothing or cleaning. Works on Linux, OSX and Windows.

netbox-docker-plugin - Netbox Docker Plugin

pymedphys - A community effort to develop an open standard library for Medical Physics in Python. Building quality transparent software together via peer review and open source distribution. Open code is better science.

docker-swarm-proxy - What if you wanted a docker exec, but for Docker swarm? - Control any node in the swarm from your CLI

sdftoolbox - Vectorized Python methods for creating, manipulating and tessellating signed distance fields.

core - AI agent microservice

Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library
Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
nutrient.io
featured
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured

Did you know that Python is
the 2nd most popular programming language
based on number of references?