diataxis-documentation-framework
technical-writing
diataxis-documentation-framework | technical-writing | |
---|---|---|
85 | 3 | |
933 | 598 | |
1.3% | 0.2% | |
6.0 | 3.9 | |
23 days ago | 12 months ago | |
HTML | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
diataxis-documentation-framework
-
Breaking down common documentation mistakes
To focus your content, leverage the Diátaxis framework.
-
Understanding User Needs in Technical Writing: How Frameworks Like Diátaxis Help
Cover Image Credit: Diátaxis’ official documentation
-
Rules for Writing Software Tutorials
For that topic some nice additional stuff: https://diataxis.fr/
- Documentation chaotique ? Diataxis à la rescousse !
- Diátaxis – A systematic approach to technical documentation authoring
-
Every Board Game Rulebook Is Awful [pdf]
I'm a little less than impressed by the presentation here. The idea that Divio is describing here is the Diataxis framework (https://diataxis.fr/), which "is the work of" (https://diataxis.fr/colophon/) Daniele Procida (https://vurt.eu/). Who, incidentally, is also giving the PyCon talk in the video on the page you linked (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4vKPhjcMZg). But I don't see anything resembling attribution for the ideas. They aren't just common industry knowledge or "received wisdom". (And the "quote" from David Laing at the top isn't really accomplishing anything, either.)
-
The Opposite of Documentation is Superstition (2020)
Both is important. And related. Documentation needs to be discoverable. I was amazed when I tried jj (jujutsu, the "new git") and it popped me into some kind of weird textual user interface after executing `jj split` and I felt lost. I guessed, pressing `?` won't hurt and it told me just to use the mouse. The menues showed the related hot keys.
But the actual documentation of the tool has room for improvement. I needed a YouTube video to get started and that's rare for me.
So what I want to say is, that you need an intuitive, discoverable UI, but also a documentation that has each case (and if it's just for linking in 1st level support cases) _and_ is discoverable. And by that I mean both easy to grasp (e.g. following https://diataxis.fr/) and also can actually be found. I've had cases where a tool had good documentation, but actually finding it was the hard part.
- Diataxis pour organiser sa documentation
- Large language models reduce public knowledge sharing on online Q&A platforms
-
Ask HN: Technical Writing Resources
I've found https://diataxis.fr/ to be an excellent framework on which to hang documentation efforts. It helps you to understand what kinds of documentation resources help users most.
technical-writing
-
Disabled and out of work for years, but need some side income, what can I do?
a few people mentioned technical writing so I will also just plug my repo quickly which has my favourite resources to learn more about tech writing and also a list of companies that pay for it (often per article so very flexible).
https://github.com/sixhobbits/technical-writing
-
Ask HN: I'm disabled and out of money. Now what?
Have you considered technical writing? I don't have experience with chronic pain but if you can still comfortably play video games maybe you can also write articles?
I used to do this as a side gig and collected some resources and places that pay here [0]
I have since started a technical publishing company [1] so it's a full time focus and most of our writers work 20h/week or less. Feel free to apply if it sounds interesting.
[0] https://github.com/sixhobbits/technical-writing
[1] https://ritza.co
-
Ask HN: How to level up you technical writing?
We are running a course for exactly this! [0] Technically applications closed already but we will likely have some more space, or we will run another cohort soon so feel free email me and I will try fit you in.
I also keep a repository of my favourite books and some other resources here [1]
And some very short advice we give to our writers here [2]
[0] https://styleguide.ritza.co/writing-course/
[1] https://github.com/sixhobbits/technical-writing
[2] https://ritza.co/handbook/improving-your-writing/how-do-I-be...
What are some alternatives?
awesome-writing - An awesome list of information to help developers write better, kinder, more helpful documentation and learning materials
whopaystechnicalwriters - A site for discovering opportunities get paid to create technical content.
arc42.org-site - (jekyll-based) website for arc42.org - the template for communicating software architectures.
Caster - Dragonfly-Based Voice Programming and Accessibility Toolkit
c4-notation - Technical resources for using the C4 model for visualizing software architecture.
fossjobs - fossjobs.net based on jobberbase
documentation-framework - "The Grand Unified Theory of Documentation" (David Laing) - a popular and transformative documentation authoring framework
mark - Sync your markdown files with Confluence pages.
pgf - A Portable Graphic Format for TeX
fastapi - FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for production
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
nango - A single API for all your integrations.