Experimental Boost.DI
C++14 Dependency Injection Library (by boost-ext)
Cppcheck
static analysis of C/C++ code (by danmar)
Experimental Boost.DI | Cppcheck | |
---|---|---|
8 | 11 | |
1,103 | 5,454 | |
1.5% | - | |
3.5 | 9.9 | |
23 days ago | 6 days ago | |
C++ | C++ | |
- | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Experimental Boost.DI
Posts with mentions or reviews of Experimental Boost.DI.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-18.
-
What are some cool modern libraries you enjoy using?
I love: https://github.com/boost-ext/di for dependency injection
-
[C++20] New way of meta-programming?
https://github.com/boost-ext/di (To detect constructor parameters and inject dependencies without runtime dispatch)
-
Dependency injection
I was looking to try boost.di for some time, looks nice. https://boost-ext.github.io/di/
- Dependency injection with c++
-
Architecture of a Qt application
Things like Dependency Injection/Inversion are a little more cumbersome in C++ but certainly can be done, and I believe there's libraries for that as well (found a couple searching around, like fruit and boost-ext di ).
-
Jodd – The Unbearable Lightness of Java
Dependency injection does not have to be dynamic, it can totally be done at compile time. Boost DI is an example: https://boost-ext.github.io/di/
- DI in c++ hurt by lack of good libraries?
-
Top five C/C++ things/tips/tricks you wish you had known earlier and are now used very often
Funny you mention dependency injection, proposed Boost.DI shall be up for Boost peer review probably in March. https://boost-ext.github.io/di/
Cppcheck
Posts with mentions or reviews of Cppcheck.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-04.
-
Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end.
- Cppcheck/Releasenotes.txt
-
Enforcing Memory Safety?
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.
-
Check out my tasks.json for C++ of VScode
Also check out (cppcheck)[https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck] if you want more static analysis
-
What are the must-have tools for any C++ developer?
My browser refuses to open that link. This is better: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck
-
Awesome Penetration Testing
cppcheck - Extensible C/C++ static analyzer focused on finding bugs.
-
C/C++ pre-commit hooks for static analyzers and linters
and five C/C++ static code analyzers: * clang-tidy * oclint * cppcheck * cpplint (recently added!) * include-what-you-use (recently added!)
-
Caught signal 11 (SIGSEGV) and signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Start by feeding your codebase to a static analysis tool like cppcheck, to rule out obvious bound-checking mistakes in it.
- How to detect stack corruption in embedded c??
-
Why static analysis on C projects is not widespread already?
Cppcheck is free. I've previously used it with a C++ project.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing Experimental Boost.DI and Cppcheck you can also consider the following projects:
kangaru - 🦘 A dependency injection container for C++11, C++14 and later
cpplint - Static code checker for C++
American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer
gcc-poison - gcc-poison
c-smart-pointers - Smart pointers for the (GNU) C programming language
stb - stb single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
cmake-lint - Fork of https://github.com/richq/cmake-lint to continue maintenance
outcome - Provides very lightweight outcome<T> and result<T> (non-Boost edition)
Experimental Boost.DI vs kangaru
Cppcheck vs cpplint
Experimental Boost.DI vs American Fuzzy Lop
Cppcheck vs gcc-poison
Experimental Boost.DI vs c-smart-pointers
Cppcheck vs stb
Experimental Boost.DI vs gcc-poison
Cppcheck vs cmake-lint
Experimental Boost.DI vs outcome
Cppcheck vs American Fuzzy Lop
Experimental Boost.DI vs stb
Cppcheck vs c-smart-pointers