warp VS rust-opendingux-test

jpackage is not the only tool for bundling Java. There is also warp-packer, an open-source tool to create self-contained binary applications from Node.js, .NET Core, and Java. warp-packer requires a similar workflow to Method 2, where you create your modified Java Runtime image and an executable script before bundling everything together into an executable.

https://github.com/dgiagio/warp just googled it, no direct experience

KeenWrite is my free, open-source, cross-platform desktop Markdown text editor developed using JavaFX. The installer script uses warp-packer to create installation-free self-extracting binaries for Windows and Linux.

My desktop text editor[1] is written using JavaFX and leans on Warp Packer[2] to create installer-free, multi-platform executable binaries (without jlink). A user contributed a new dark theme[3], which blends nicely with the desktop.

The JavaFX-based WebView (an HTML rendering component) is lauded, but has no direct API to control the scroll position and is itself a memory hog. Scrolling must be handled through JavaScript, and that indirection is as unwieldy as you can probably imagine. FlyingSaucer is a workable alternative to WebView, but comes with numerous technical issues that rear themselves when embedding a Swing widget inside a JavaFX application---as I discovered during development.

Were I to start from scratch, I would definitely seek out alternative cross-platform programming languages for desktop application development.

[1]: https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite

[2]: https://github.com/dgiagio/warp

[3]: https://i.ibb.co/QpqS0NS/screenshot.png

"Java -- possible, but you'll need a startup script to just call java -jar some-tool.jar; (also not a good fit for short-lived tools, mainly due to startup times;)"

Two technologies to look at:

* Warp Packer -- https://github.com/dgiagio/warp/

* Liberica Native Image Kit -- https://bell-sw.com/pages/liberica-native-image-kit/

Warp Packer bundles my JavaFX desktop application, KeenWrite into single binary executable files:

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite/releases/download/2.... (Linux)

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite/releases/download/2.... (Windows)

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite/releases/download/2....

The start-up time for the first launch of the .bin or .exe is slow because it unpacks to a user directory. Subsequent starts are fine enough, even when running from the command-line as a short-lived task. Here's the script that creates the self-contained executable files:

https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite/blob/master/installe...

To create a release for all three files, I run a single shell script from a build machine:

https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite/blob/master/release....

I could probably generate a binary for MacOS, but not enough people have asked.

> By cross-compiling one usually understands compiling for the same OS but different architecture.

I don't even consider that to rise to the level of "cross compiling".

Getting started with emscripten to target WASM for C and C++ is rather a chore of dependency wrangling IME. Targeting WASM from Rust, OTOH, is trivial. Targeting windows from linux with Rust is also quite straightforward, as has been experimenting with targeting consoles or Android from Windows.

Targeting a MIPS32 OpenDingux target from Windows was much more of a chore. The toolchain with libs, headers, etc. that I used is just a *.tar.bz2 that expects to be extracted to /opt/gcw0-toolchain of a linux distro specifically, and embedded absolute paths all over the place make changing that difficult. I do resort to WSL on Windows, basically only because of those embedded paths: https://github.com/MaulingMonkey/rust-opendingux-test

Acquiring the appropriate libs and headers to link/compile against for cross compiling is always an adventure, but Rust isn't making things any worse IME.