denoising-diffusion-pytorch VS stylegan2-pytorch

I’m trying to train a diffusion model using this code (https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch). My idea is to take a short audio segment, transform it into a spectrogram and train the model on these images then have it generate spectrograms then go back to audio. However the model requires square images. I cannot for the life of me figure out how to make a square spectrogram. Also is a regular spectrogram or a mel spectrogram better for this application?

Generally it's without weights, but MusicLM is also a WIP more mature implementations have descriptions on how to train them and follow ups on small scale/crowd-sourced experiments & research[1].

[1]: https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch

[1] https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1sjy9odlSSy0RBVgMTgP7s99NXsqglsUL?usp=sharing#scrollTo=KOYPSxPf_LL7 [2] https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch/blob/main/denoising_diffusion_pytorch/denoising_diffusion_pytorch.py

Sure. I am using: https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch

Lucidrains GitHub is always my go to repo for understandable paper implementations https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch

Thanks for the reply. Is there any suggestion if I wanted to train a model to generate half cat and half butterfly images what I should do? I git cloned the code from https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch and trained from scratch.

DDIM/DDPM are the same model to train, they only differ at inference time. To start I would recommend building from lucidrains' MIT licenced version (https://github.com/lucidrains/denoising-diffusion-pytorch). Just play around with the models until you gain an intuition.

Our codebase for the diffusion models builds heavily on OpenAI's ADM codebase , lucidrains, Stable Diffusion, Lightning and Hugging Face. Thanks for open-sourcing!

Once you understand these papers you can begin to understand Palette, and from there I would start with an open-source diffusion implementation like this one and then modify it to suit your needs!

export default function ChannelListBottomBar(): JSX.Element { const { client } = useChatContext(); const [micActive, setMicActive] = useState(false); const [audioActive, setAudioActive] = useState(false); return (

{client.user?.image && (

div> )}

{client.user?.name} span> {client.user?.online ? 'Online' : 'Offline'} span> p> button>

setMicActive((currentValue) => !currentValue)} > button> setAudioActive((currentValue) => !currentValue)} > button> button> div> ); }

I wonder if we will ever get a realism model which can produce normal faces like https://thispersondoesnotexist.com instead of like super symmetrical faces of models

this has been in circulation since a while AI images took off, and they certainly weren't convincing before they did. You know the old "try to name one thing in this image" macro? Pretty sure that was AI generated, there was also thispersondoesnotexist.com which was always pretty good but of course it is

Not the workflow for these images, but if you easily want to spice up your gens with a bit more natural look, try using images from thispersondoesnotexist.com with IPAdapter face model.

...then they just use the app on generated images of not real people (potentially based on specific inputs to remind you of a real person).

Also we can generate very realistic faces with AI, https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ (old example), fully 3D faces are doable at this point. So in another 5-10 years a low profile model like him wouldn't even be hired for this, they would just generate a digital face model. Unionizing will only speed up studios adoption of digital replacements.

It looks like they all use a profile picture made with https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/