debug-toolkit VS homelab

We're very much not a company of one anymore, but I used Unicorn Platform for our startups website (http://robusta.dev)

It's optimized for building a decent looking startup website in half an hour.

We now have an in house designer and frontend team so the whole thing will be replaced soon... But it got us fairly far.

I use it all the time when hiring!

We're open source (https://robusta.dev) and very involved in the kubernetes ecosystem so GitHub history is extremely relevant when we look at candidates.

We'll hire people with no GitHub activity too, but when it's available it's great

Github: https://github.com/robusta-dev/robusta Marketing site: http://robusta.dev/ Docs: https://docs.robusta.dev/master/

We're using Hikaru extensively in Robusta. The best part (well, other then the ease of use) is that Tom is super responsive to issues on GitHub and always happy to help.

To everyone saying that Kubernetes is unnecessary, try implementing autoscaling, service discovery, secrets management, and autohealing in a vendor independent way without it.

Of course none of that is necessary for a self hosted home lab, but neither is gitops.

This is a very nice example of how to set stuff up properly.

OP, I would love to see Robusta (https://robusta.dev) as part of this too. It's definitely in line with your vision of automating everything, as it let's you automate the response to alerts and other events in your cluster. (Disclaimer: I'm one of the maintainers)

K3s is great, I use it on all of my personal clusters (here and here). It's lightweight and very easy to manage.

https://github.com/khuedoan/homelab if you haven't come across it yet. To add to your bookmarks.

I have my Kubernetes homelab public on GitHub, everything is automated and defined as code. Hope it will help you get started and see what's possible.

So I 've got inspired by https://github.com/khuedoan/homelab and initially after lurking this sub for a while I came up with a plan to consider some of these solutions: - openmediavault as a VM to use 2x4TB /w ext4 & mergerFS or TrueNAS in RAID1 - I think mergerFS gives more options to increase storage with extra drives later, but I don't plan to hoard lots of data. Also rather opted for tiered cache via SSD to save some power but if such lot of VMs would write this would work? - nextcloud VM to easiely manage files via browser and have mobile app sync for photos with some kind of gallery plugins etc - I think this may be optional if there's other solution as nextcloud seems to not be light. Or something like Seafile would be enough? - kubernetes - k3s/microk8s single VM node or 2 VM nodes - would I need more? and so - can then openmediavault be used as a storage for it like TrueNAS? - Rancher - if used k3s - I quite liked the UI of rancher desktop, more than portainer when I tried with microk8s, but I don't pass on using something else, eg. Lens - Gitea - for hosting code - tekton / teamcity - for running tests and commit build hooks - fluxCD / argoCD - for deploying builds to kubernetes

khuedoan/homelab

Here's my project (running on 4 mini PC) that I'm using for learning and self-hosting https://github.com/khuedoan/homelab, it's fully automated from empty disk to operating services.

You can checkout my repo If you'd like to do the same for your homelab (it's also modular so you can just use the OS installation part)

Here're the links to the Markdown source and the web view.

You can checkout my Kubernetes homelab, it's fully automated from empty disk, very customizable and extensible.

You can view the code here: https://github.com/khuedoan/homelab (the ./metal folder)