db_watch VS rethinkdb_rebirth

Compare db_watch vs rethinkdb_rebirth and see what are their differences.

rethinkdb_rebirth

The open-source database for the realtime web. (by rethinkdb)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
db_watch rethinkdb_rebirth
1 1
0 1,016
- -
0.0 0.0
about 3 years ago about 5 years ago
JavaScript C++
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

db_watch

Posts with mentions or reviews of db_watch. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-22.

rethinkdb_rebirth

Posts with mentions or reviews of rethinkdb_rebirth. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-22.
  • Ask HN: Is there a way to subscribe to an SQL query for changes?
    17 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Apr 2021
    I know [RethinkDB][1] used to do this with their SQL-like ReQL language, but I looked around a bit and can't find much else about it - and I would have thought it would be more common.

    If we think about modern frontends using SQL-based backends, essentially every time we render, its ultimately the result of a tree of SQL queries (queries depend on results of other queries) running in the backend. Our frontend app state is just a tree of materialized views of our database which depend on each other. We've got a bunch of state management libraries that deal with trees but they don't fit so well with relational/graph-like data.

    I came across a Postgres proposal for [Incremental View Maintenance][2] which generates a diff against an existing query with the purpose of updating a materialized view. Oracle also has [`FAST REFRESH`](https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/DWHSG/refresh.htm#DWHSG8361) for materialized views.

    I guess it's relatively easy to do until you start needing joins or traversing graphs/hierarchies - which is why its maybe avoided.

    [1]: https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb_rebirth

What are some alternatives?

When comparing db_watch and rethinkdb_rebirth you can also consider the following projects:

integrate - Core IntegrateDB source code repository.

realtime - Broadcast, Presence, and Postgres Changes via WebSockets

pg-live-select - Live Updating PostgreSQL SELECT statements

Hasura - Blazing fast, instant realtime GraphQL APIs on your DB with fine grained access control, also trigger webhooks on database events.

flow - 🌊 Continuously synchronize the systems where your data lives, to the systems where you _want_ it to live, with Estuary Flow. 🌊

cainophile

timely-dataflow - A modular implementation of timely dataflow in Rust

PipelineDB - High-performance time-series aggregation for PostgreSQL

noria - Fast web applications through dynamic, partially-stateful dataflow