daistats VS ethereum-burn-stats

For more accurate stats check out: - https://daistats.com/ - https://makerburn.com/ - https://maker.defiexplore.com/

On daistats.com you can see that DAI is currently collaterized with USDC for 28.6%. Combine this with the fact that DAI has an overcollaterization ratio of 137.58%. This means that DAI could survive a complete USDC crash much better than you'd think, possibly not even depegging from $1.00 at all.

Looking at https://daistats.com/.. have never seen unhealtier numbers..

USDC & USDP (both centralized) account for 70% of DAI collateral. https://daistats.com/

It's not the thing propping up crypto prices. DAI is relatively small ($6.5B mcap), DAI is also partly backed by USDC [1], which is backed by cash and US government bonds (held at Circle) so it would be extremely difficult for DAI to lose collateral backing faster than keepers could liquidate positions. Does DAI have an influence on the $1T crypto industry? Of course, but its liquidity pales in comparison to USDC, USDT, and BUSD (~$100B between them). If the market is crashing, it's doubtful DAI is the culprit (as it's actually a solid, battle-tested protocol that already lived through the Covid crash and '18 and '19 severe drawdown and many other trying market scenarios).

But what you say is true of all debt markets. Debt has an inflating effect on the price, and when those debts get wiped off from liquidations, it can have a cascading affect in the opposite direction from that on the way up. That is precisely what happened to the real estate market in '08. People didn't think the real estate market could go down in terms of price. And yet, it did, and we had a major financial crisis as a result as real estate prices drew down 50% or more in some areas and foreclosure supply flooded the market.

[1] https://daistats.com/#/

It's not an algo stable, otherwise your post is solid. It is overcollateralized by mainly USDC and ETH (see https://daistats.com/) and only when that collateral fails to make the protocol whole would it even begin to consider using MKR as a backstop. The centralized aspect of course coming from the fact that it is heavily collateralized by USDC. This was done to keep DAI firmly on peg, for now. There are plans in motion to reduce reliance on USDC.

EIP-1559 was a surprise to me in a good way. We had spent so much time imagining what it would look like, probably expecting it to be a bit rough around the edges at first. The adoption numbers at the beginning were not high (still lots of type 0/1 transactions) but the basefee was working like a charm. Props to watchtheburn.com and perema's fee feed, which I used to track the early deployment!

Transaction fees are burned, but the transactions fees are so low that the burnt amount is unnoticeable. Burns are in the tens of millions of dollars while issuance is 100x greater in the billions of dollars. Compare this to Ethereum's burn, which currently reduces issuance by nearly 60%.

Ethereum PoS is one of the ONLY networks that's expected to be deflationary due to its extremely-high fees. Ethereum PoW's amount of inflation is now offset 35% in Jun 2022 by the amount burned per transaction from EIP-1559. After the merge, the issuance is expected to drop 80%, making Ethereum PoS the first popular blockchain that will have supply deflation and become a positive-sum investment.

Much love and respect to the individuals/teams that coded and hosted watchtheburn.com 🔥 for the last year. They kept the site up a few days longer than they initially planned for, but have now officially shut down.

WatchTheBurn shows a total of 3,099,476 ETH since eip1559

https://watchtheburn.com/ is closing down?

look at the tips column of this website https://watchtheburn.com/ to see what miners are earning now.