CUPS
llvm-project
CUPS | llvm-project | |
---|---|---|
52 | 353 | |
1,846 | 25,839 | |
1.2% | 2.0% | |
2.3 | 10.0 | |
5 months ago | about 5 hours ago | |
C | C++ | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
CUPS
-
A new, modern, and secure print experience from Windows
If your printer for example supports IPP and Postscript or PDF then that would be possible. Higher end (commercial) HP printers usually offer this functionality. Take a look at CUPS [1] if you want to know more about IPP.
[1] https://www.cups.org/
-
Trying to set up an old Zebra LP2844 as a network printer
Your best bet is to set up a print server. The support page even has a CUPS driver. CUPS is well known for supporting a lot of printers. I run it on an old Mac-mini running Ubuntu. You can run it on something as small as a Raspberry Pi.
-
PostScript’s Sudden Death in Sonoma
Apple should be more open about their removals. It isn't clear how this affects their CUPS implementation or PostScript printers https://www.cups.org
-
Microsoft to kill off third-party printer drivers in Windows
CUPS is under the Apache License 2.0 , so they can just use it, if they wanted: https://github.com/apple/cups/blob/master/LICENSE
They won't of course.
- On the harm shareholders can do to OpenSource
-
My collection of Ansible roles for self-hosting everything with Rocky Linux and FreeIPA
CUPS printing server
-
Is this easily solvable? I am going crazy
Another alternative is for you to set up a print server in VLAN20. Then set up the print server to print to the printer in VLAN99. CUPS is pretty easy to set up.
- “Sorry to bother you” me, to my printer
-
Sharing a Printer in a WiFi Network
But after both Apple and Linux switched their CUPS-based printing systems to Python 3 or some other breaking change that I don't mind to understand, the only way to print a document seemed to be using a PC running Microsoft Windows. So I had to save a PDF in the cloud or email it to myself, then startup Windows on a laptop physically connected to the printer, start the printing process, check if the paper has been printed successfully, and shut down Windows. What a waste of time and energy!
-
House upgrade: Need to keep an old USB-only printer connected wirelessly, would this work? (Old Router connected to new router)
Another option is to set up a print server. There are free print server programs that you can run on a computer. CUPS is pretty popular. I used to run it on a Raspberry Pi for an ancient LaserJet 1012. That printer just keeps going.
llvm-project
-
Qt and C++ Trivial Relocation (Part 1)
As far as I know, libstdc++'s representation has two advantages:
First, it simplifies the implementation of `s.data()`, because you hold a pointer that invariably points to the first character of the data. The pointer-less version needs to do a branch there. Compare libstdc++ [1] to libc++ [2].
[1]: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/065dddc/libstdc++-v3/...
[2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1a96179/libcxx/inc...
Basically libstdc++ is paying an extra 8 bytes of storage, and losing trivial relocatability, in exchange for one fewer branch every time you access the string's characters. I imagine that the performance impact of that extra branch is tiny, and massively confounded in practice by unrelated factors that are clearly on libc++'s side (e.g. libc++'s SSO buffer is 7 bytes bigger, despite libc++'s string object itself being smaller). But it's there.
The second advantage is that libstdc++ already did it that way, and to change it would be an ABI break; so now they're stuck with it. I mean, obviously that's not an "advantage" in the intuitive sense; but it's functionally equivalent to an advantage, in that it's a very strong technical answer to the question "Why doesn't libstdc++ just switch to doing it libc++'s way?"
-
Playing with DragonRuby Game Toolkit (DRGTK)
This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap.
- Add support for Qualcomm Oryon processor
-
Ask HN: Which books/resources to understand modern Assembler?
'Computer Architeture: A Quantitative Apporach" and/or more specific design types (mips, arm, etc) can be found under the Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Architeture and Design.
"Getting Started with LLVM Core Libraries: Get to Grips With Llvm Essentials and Use the Core Libraries to Build Advanced Tools "
"The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) : LLVM" https://aosabook.org/en/v1/llvm.html
"Tourist Guide to LLVM source code" : https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1453
llvm home page : https://llvm.org/
llvm tutorial : https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/
llvm reference : https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html
learn by examples : C source code to 'llvm' bitcode : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9148890/how-to-make-clan...
-
Flang-new: How to force arrays to be allocated on the heap?
See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/88344
https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/flang-new-how-to-forc...
- The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-
Programming from Top to Bottom - Parsing
You can never mistake type_declaration with an identifier, otherwise the program will not work. Aside from that constraint, you are free to name them whatever you like, there is no one standard, and each parser has it own naming conventions, unless you are planning to use something like LLVM. If you are interested, you can see examples of naming in different language parsers in the AST Explorer.
-
Look ma, I wrote a new JIT compiler for PostgreSQL
> There is one way to make the LLVM JIT compiler more usable, but I fear it’s going to take years to be implemented: being able to cache and reuse compiled queries.
Actually, it's implemented in LLVM for years :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a98546ebcd2a692e...
-
C++ Safety, in Context
> It's true, this was a CVE in Rust and not a CVE in C++, but only because C++ doesn't regard the issue as a problem at all. The problem definitely exists in C++, but it's not acknowledged as a problem, let alone fixed.
Can you find a link that substantiates your claim? You're throwing out some heavy accusations here that don't seem to match reality at all.
Case in point, this was fixed in both major C++ libraries:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/ebf6175464768983a2d...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4f67a909902d8ab9...
So what C++ community refused to regard this as an issue and refused to fix it? Where is your supporting evidence for your claims?
-
Clang accepts MSVC arguments and targets Windows if its binary is named clang-cl
For everyone else looking for the magic in this almost 7k lines monster, look at line 6610 [1].
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/8ec28af8eaff5acd0d...
What are some alternatives?
Nginx Proxy Manager - Docker container for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
Paperless - Scan, index, and archive all of your paper documents
Lark - Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.
mayan-edms
gcc
cups - OpenPrinting CUPS Sources
SDL - Simple Directmedia Layer
EdPaper - Helps you organizing your paperwork
cosmopolitan - build-once run-anywhere c library
pfSense - Main repository for pfSense
windmill - Open-source developer platform to turn scripts into workflows and UIs. Fastest workflow engine (5x vs Airflow). Open-source alternative to Airplane and Retool.