cucumber-ruby VS Gatling

It's a custom built "framework" that uses all the tools the big guys use but without any of the cost they demand. Which means we can make it bark like a dog if we want to. We use Cucumber for our test scripts, that gives us a clean and easily readable format that everyone from the CEO to Mike from Canmore can write, we use TestNG to package those test scripts and run them in parallel using a class that extends AbstractTestNGCucumberTests, we trigger the executions with xml files. Everything is packaged by maven and that allows us to execute on the command line (in a relatively clean way) and that allows us to easily execute the framework using something like Jenkins pipelines. We've also set up profiles in our POM.xml file so we can pass parameters on the command line and execute a specific test: something like mvn clean test dTest=TEST-1408 dPlatform=android dVersion=13 dbrowser=chrome. Or we can say something like mvn clean test dFull and that will test every regression test we have against every platform we support. These command line parameters are used to fill in the folder names of paths to the specific file.

Behavior driven development looks like a good idea and popular frameworks like cucumber have a ton of features and available material ... for other languages that is, since the official site mentions the C++ framework as unmaintained

For both of them, I use cucumber and a test look likes

there are many frameworks, we use cmocka for unit tests. For integration tests my understanding is that everyone pretty much rolls their own solution (we use cucumber to drive them).

Cucumber.

did you mean cucumber.io ? will check it out, thanks mate

What you're describing is most commonly known as acceptance testing, or behavior-driven tests. There's an excellent framework for this called Cucumber. They have gems for both plain Ruby and Rails.

Gatling: An open-source load and performance testing tool primarily designed for web applications, Gatling utilizes a simple domain-specific language (DSL) for creating and maintaining test scripts. It supports HTTP/2 and allows recording and generation of scenarios directly from a browser. The tool also provides detailed performance reports that are easy to analyze.

Performance and load testing are essential parts of GraphQL API testing. It ensures APIs can handle expected traffic volumes and respond within acceptable timeframes. You can use tools like Apache JMeter or Gatling to generate realistic loads and evaluate the API's performance under different scenarios. Techniques like batched queries and caching can help mitigate this issue.

New to the .NET community and trying to learn! I have used tools such as Apache JMeter (Java), gatling.io (Java) and Locust (Python) that are decent full featured web perf frameworks. Typically these integrate well with your code, and can be run as part of your unit/integration tests and produce offline reports

Gatling , this is what we tested concurrency with. Setting up might take a while depending on your exp. but the tool is solid.

I used SpringBoot 3.0.2, GraalVM 22 (JVM mode), a MacOS 2,6 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i7, running 1000 users for 5 minutes. The idea was to test how memory consumption and CPU usage evolve. Below, I compared the footprint of these three solutions. I collected the total count of requests, throughput, memory consumption, and CPU usage using VisualVM and Gatling.

Load test your code to simulate a production load (you can use tools like k6 or Gatling)

k6 is our preferred javascript based cloud tester for light webservices. gattling if you have (a monolith with) workflows and need more formalized code to prove/audit your testing.

It's read as "Ochikisu" and origin is the machine gun manufacturer Hotchkiss because this tool does not have as much firepower as the Gatling.