crusader VS sniffglue

one of my sadnesses is so few tests, except those designed by the bufferbloat project, test up + down + latency at the same time.

I like this new one: https://github.com/Zoxc/crusader/releases/tag/v0.0.10-testin.... My favorite remains the rrul test out of the flent.org suite.

Most web speed tests have nearly no predictive power for testing videoconferencing quality, although I am delighted speed test.net cloudflare and others have added a "responsiveness" metric that too few see... https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/speedtests/

I have been steering folk at this new test - called crusader - as it captures the essence of the baseline rrul flent test testing both up + down and latency at the same time - and as it is written in rust, runs on everything. https://github.com/Zoxc/crusader/releases/tag/v0.0.10-testin...

If you want to test for bufferbloat locally, you can run crusader on both the game streaming server and client.

https://github.com/Zoxc/crusader is written in rust and has a detailed staggered start test.

I've used my fork of your PR to generate bandwidth graphs on Android with crusader. Hopefully I can bump it to the real crate soon :)

I'd would be interesting to see the result from crusader with hardware-only queue, a larger FIFO queue and fq-codel.

I've been using egui / android-activity for crusader. Its state is a bit rough lacking proper keyboard support and needing git repos. Having the GUI in Rust does help reduce FFI. egui also doesn't fit the energy efficiency requirement of OP.

Looks interesting! How does it compare to sniffglue?

You might also be interested in https://github.com/kpcyrd/sniffglue

sniffglue - Secure multithreaded packet sniffer.

Any plans to use https://github.com/kpcyrd/sniffglue/ as the backend? It's much more resilient to untrusted input than Wireshark, but does not presently have a nice GUI.