crunchy-bytes VS protopuf

Compare crunchy-bytes vs protopuf and see what are their differences.

crunchy-bytes

C++ 17 Schema Serialization Library (by crabmandable)
Cereal CMake header-only Metaprogramming Python Schema Serialization TOML CPP Cpp17 Embedded
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

protopuf

Protocol Puffers: A little, highly templated, and protobuf-compatible serialization/deserialization header-only library written in C++20 (by PragmaTwice)
Protobuf CPP Serialization Template Library Metaprogramming header-only
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
crunchy-bytes protopuf
2 2
6 141
- -
0.0 0.0
almost 2 years ago over 1 year ago
C++ C++
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

crunchy-bytes

Posts with mentions or reviews of crunchy-bytes. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-24.

protopuf

Posts with mentions or reviews of protopuf. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-16.
  • protopuf: throw away protoc and describe protobuf schema just by c++ templates!
    5 projects | /r/cpp | 16 May 2022
    You can see some benchmarks in https://github.com/PragmaTwice/protopuf/tree/master/test/benchmark and get the results of it in github actions. But the benchmark is not comprehensive at the moment, and I realized that part of the slowness of protobuf comes from the fact that it checks if the string follows utf8

What are some alternatives?

When comparing crunchy-bytes and protopuf you can also consider the following projects:

cereal - A C++11 library for serialization

proxinject - a socks5 proxy injection tool for Windows, making selected processes proxy-able

glfwpp - GLFW C++ Wrapper - thin, modern, C++17, header-only GLFW wrapper

autoproto - Replacement derive macros for `prost::Message`, and supporting traits and types to make implementing this trait easier

cnl - A Compositional Numeric Library for C++

s2 - A data-binding function for the DOM.

refl-cpp - Static reflection for C++17 (compile-time enumeration, attributes, proxies, overloads, template functions, metaprogramming).

Magic Enum C++ - Static reflection for enums (to string, from string, iteration) for modern C++, work with any enum type without any macro or boilerplate code

Cap'n Proto - Cap'n Proto serialization/RPC system - core tools and C++ library

palanteer - Visual Python and C++ nanosecond profiler, logger, tests enabler

Nameof C++ - Nameof operator for modern C++, simply obtain the name of a variable, type, function, macro, and enum

crunchy-bytes vs cereal protopuf vs proxinject crunchy-bytes vs glfwpp protopuf vs autoproto crunchy-bytes vs cnl protopuf vs s2 crunchy-bytes vs refl-cpp protopuf vs Magic Enum C++ crunchy-bytes vs Magic Enum C++ protopuf vs Cap'n Proto crunchy-bytes vs palanteer protopuf vs Nameof C++