cruft VS Poe the Poet

I maintain cookiecutter templates (can't share. It's in companies private repository) which have all these tool included along with some CI/CD pipelines. In case the template changes, we use cruft to update existing project which was using that template.

Have a look at cruft. It also uses cookicutter but has extra features like updating existing projects with template updates over the project lifetime.

There's this project that does that: https://github.com/cruft/cruft/

https://cookiecutter.readthedocs.io/en/1.7.2/ https://github.com/cruft/cruft

Compatible with the new pyproject.toml standard, and working well with poetry, there's poethepoet. It's a good alternative, it keeps in the python environment, it's installable through pip(x), and it's cross platform for the windows pythonistas (and there are some, not everyone has more than 1 computer at home...)

I use Poe The Poet https://github.com/nat-n/poethepoet.

So the Poetry maintainer has explained here about why they don’t have the better scripts support you mentioned. However, someone has already built this plugin for Poetry to achieve it.

Poe the Poet, probably.

I've been working on this tool for a while now, which I'm starting to feel is ready for a bit more exposure, it's called Poe the Poet.

nat-n: developer of poethepoet

poe: Not Django-specific, but nice task-runner that uses pyproject.toml