crossover VS AppImageKit

Crossover simply doesn't work.

Took me 10 seconds to search for it...

OP are you on PC? I found out a lot of my motion sickness was exacerbated by lacking a point to focus on on the screen. I found this app that allows you to overlay a customizable crosshair that really helped alleviate my symptoms: https://github.com/lacymorrow/crossover

I was using 27 inch lg gaming monitor for csgo when I was at home and it had a inbuilt feature that provided crosshair overlayed on screen and i have been using it for years now and vac has not detected , now I have shifted to hostel so now i play on my laptop and find it to aim , i wanted a solution to this , a crosshair overlay that cant be detected vac , i found this https://github.com/lacymorrow/crossover is this okay or vac will ban me

App im talking about is a crosshair overlay.

Am I able to use the program crossover? or will I get banned. Here: https://github.com/lacymorrow/crossover

A quick google turns up https://github.com/lacymorrow/crossover

What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since i prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros.

Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years.

[0] https://appimage.org/

I found a similar issue on github and tried this solution but still getting the same error .

There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file.

[1] https://appimage.org

Nah i think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard.

Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins.

```dlopen(): error loading libfuse.so.2 AppImages require FUSE to run. You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage if you run it with the --appimage-extract option. See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE for more information```

This doesn't look like a squashfs image. Cannot mount AppImage, please check your FUSE setup. You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage  if you run it with the --appimage-extract option.  See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE  for more information open dir error: No such file or directory

appimages. Appimages are similar to flatpaks, exept that they are a file you download and double click to run. Think of them as portable softwares like windows has (portable apps). They are sandboxed too. You can learn more about appimages here