core-admin
django-admin-interface
core-admin | django-admin-interface | |
---|---|---|
6 | 5 | |
499 | 1,676 | |
- | - | |
7.1 | 8.9 | |
about 2 months ago | 10 days ago | |
C# | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
core-admin
-
Ask HN: Why aren't Django Admin style dashboards popular in other frameworks?
Like most things, it's probably a combination of things.
The Django Admin existed before Django publicly existed. That meant that once anyone started using Django they knew that they should constrain their use of Django in certain ways so that the Django Admin would work with their usage. Features that would be added to Django would be built with the Django Admin in mind.
Many tools like Flask or FastAPI don't have an opinionated model layer like Django. Without that, you can't really create an admin interface programatically. People could be storing their data in any sort of fashion anywhere. How would one build an admin system for something like Flask or FastAPI where there's no convention around how people set up data access? A lot of frameworks out there don't tell you "access your data in this way" or "this is how users will be authenticated." Without those two things, it's hard to really create an admin system.
There are similar systems available for some frameworks, but since they aren't part of the core framework, they don't get the same attention. Someone creates it, but it doesn't have the kind of community buy-in that sustains it. One of the odd things about Django is that the admin system is under `django.contrib` which indicated that they didn't intend for it to be in the core of Django forever, but that's not really how `django.contrib` ended up. It continued to be a core part of Django maintained as part of the framework.
Like I said, there are admin dashboards available in other frameworks like RailsAdmin (https://github.com/railsadminteam/rails_admin) or Core Admin for .NET (https://github.com/edandersen/core-admin) and I'm sure there's more. However, both Rails and .NET provide most of what Django provides (and a lot more than most frameworks). Rails and .NET both have a default data access ORM that a majority of people using those frameworks tend to use. .NET has built-in authentication/authorization so the admin can work off that. Rails doesn't have auth, but RailsAdmin uses some plugins.
- Why Is the Django Admin "Ugly"?
-
CRUD on many tables
If CRUD only is your goal, there are existing out of the box options such as this: https://github.com/edandersen/core-admin
-
How do .NET developers handle content creation?
There are projects in other languages/frameworks like .NET (https://github.com/edandersen/core-admin, https://github.com/serenity-is/Serenity), but nothing quite has the momentum that the Django admin has.
- Does .net mvc come with an model-based admin panel
django-admin-interface
-
Why Is the Django Admin "Ugly"?
There's a good plugin called django-admin-interface that cleans up the Admin page to a point where it is still recognizable as the admin page but looks nicer. You also can customize the color themes, matching the palette of the app.
https://github.com/fabiocaccamo/django-admin-interface
-
What do you think of Django Admin?
When I started to use django more than 10 years ago, I was really happy for the admin, immediately after I felt the necessity to customise (re-brand) it for each client, so I looked for available packages and my conclusion was that all admin replacements in the end become hard to maintain, have many issues open and are abandoned, so I ended up writing my own solution that does exactly what I needed: customise the interface using the admin itself. Many years later my solution still works and have few issues open, I use it on a daily basis on different projects and many other users use it. This package is publicly available on GitHub/PyPi: django-admin-interface (I’m the author, any feedback is appreciated).
-
With django-jet not supporting Django 4+, what are some alternatives?
I’m the author of django-admin-interface, it is actively maintained, well tested and appreciated by the community (more than 1k stars), give a look at it! ;)
-
Has your Django projects ever helped someone or a cause?
Sure, I published and maintain many django packages, the most appreciated one (more than 1k stars) is django-admin-interface.
-
Django admin looks dated and is not mobile friendly, any better options ?
I've been using django admin interface and it's great. Really well written. https://github.com/fabiocaccamo/django-admin-interface
What are some alternatives?
piranha.core - Piranha CMS is the friendly editor-focused CMS for .NET that can be used both as an integrated CMS or as a headless API.
django-rest-framework - Web APIs for Django. 🎸
RazorEngineCore - .NET6 Razor Template Engine
django-jazzmin - Jazzy theme for Django
kaffy - Powerfully simple admin package for phoenix applications
doccano - Open source annotation tool for machine learning practitioners.
H.Pipes - A simple, easy to use, strongly-typed, async wrapper around .NET named pipes.
django-newsfeed - A news curator and newsletter subscription package for Django
WopiHost - ASP.NET Core MVC implementation of the WOPI protocol. Enables integration with WOPI clients such as Office Online Server.
django-sql-explorer - Easily share data across your company via SQL queries. From Grove Collab.
Blogifier - Blogifier is an open-source publishing platform Written in ASP.NET and Blazor WebAssembly. With Blogifier make a personal blog or a website.
django-template - A battle-tested Django 2.1 project template with configurations for AWS, Heroku, App Engine, and Docker.