containerlab_labs VS yang

1) Initiate the topology using Containerlab : $ containerlab deploy -t 04_topology.clab.yml The containlab template loks like follows, you can also find it here.

You can find this Lab's files on my github, we are using ContainerLab to deploy the setup and connect nodes to each other, after we have 3 diffirent node types to configure : 1) Endpoint VMs : uses net-tools containers, configured using basic shell . 2) CEs (FRRrouting) : using Containerlab configuration is deployed with initiation of the nodes, FRR Open routing software does not support gNMI since its normally deployed as a part of a bigger package. 3) PEs (IOS-XRV 6.5.1) : these 2 PE/P will completly configured using gNMI.

You can find the topology files on my Github here :)

Cisco IOS XE YANG Models: https://github.com/YangModels/yang

If you dont have access to a live device, you can read the YANG trees of vendors or OpenConfig which you can clone from Vendor's Yang Models in this link, you can fond your needed path in 2 ways : 1) Tree hirarichy, including variable types and keys using PYang.

Cisco's IOS-XR/NexusOS/IOS-XE/NCS supported Yang models https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/main/vendor/cisco

You can look into the different vendors that support yang nestconf/restconf. Here is a link to their git with different vendors. https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/master/vendor

But I CANNOT for the life of me figure out how to get the pipeline not to drop any new entires I add to its metrics.json file. I tried adding the tcam yang file found here.