concurrencpp VS Stroika

I am using concurrencpp for my project. What I like about it is that it's basically a thread pool factory with coroutines. It allows for better structuring / organizing of multithreaded work. So for me the main advantage of coroutines is that the code looks easier to follow

Equivalent concurrencpp code:

I agree. I use concurrencpp for the exact use case you described - coroutines running on simple-to-understand-executors which return some asynchronous pipe for communication.

If you look at concurrencpp, you can control exactly where and how coroutines are resumed, using executors.

concurrencpp. Modern concurrency for C++. Tasks, executors, timers and C++20 coroutines to rule them all.

Just use a good third party library like concurrencpp .

Hi, I am looking for a header-only C++14 (or lower) quality thread pool. Ideally, it would be similar to BS::thread_pool but in C++14. Most of them I find on GitHub are bloated (e.g. concurrencpp) or have many open Issues. Ideal usage would be similar to:

I use concurrencpp for my asynchronous code and the repo is written in modern cpp, with tests, sanitizers and what not.

Stroika is a modern, portable, thread-savvy, C++ application framework. It makes writing high performance C++ applications easier by providing safe, flexible, modular building blocks.

I suggest looking at - an open-source project of mine.

Did you read ? I think this maybe the key to understanding my approach to performance. If you read that and agree with it, you may change your tune. If you read it and disagree, then I certainly can understand your not liking the rest of what you find about Stroika performance.

I recommend a project I work on: https://github.com/SophistSolutions/Stroika