colorls VS lsd

colorls: Colorizes the ls output with color and icons (requires gem). Includes many useful flags, such as --gs for Git status, or -t for a tree view: I use an alias to replace ls with colorls:

colorls is installed for a neat ls command called lc in powerlevel10k: https://github.com/athityakumar/colorls

# Fancy Bash Prompts. Notes From my .bashrc #---------------------------------- # Homepage, then the command to activate # Starship -> https://starship.rs/ #eval "$(starship init bash)" # Silver https://github.com/reujab/silver #source <(silver init) # Pureline https://github.com/chris-marsh/pureline #source ~/.pureline/pureline ~/.pureline.conf ## another nice little tool # colorls ruby thing # https://github.com/athityakumar/colorls#installation

Now my terminal looks very good! Unfortunately, though, I noticed a screenshot from the colorls Github page and now I definitely want to configure fish to look like this, but that theme is made for zsh (oh my zsh).

This project is heavily inspired by the super colorls project but with some little differences. For example it is written in rust and not in ruby which makes it much faster.

Could be wrong but I think that is colorls - https://github.com/athityakumar/colorls

lsd

If you use lsd there is a --total-size option

ls aliased to lsd

Just in case people don’t get the sarcasm here https://github.com/Peltoche/lsd

lsd

lsd is faster & more customizable than exa