gfx VS nanosvg

This should work with LVGL but I haven't tried it. It does work with https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix and https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx and the example project uses that.

The graphics library https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx/

I've developed a graphics library that supports TrueType, SVG, PNG, JPG, alpha blending and X11 colors here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx/

The ESP32 will reboot with a brownout message if you draw too much current. Obviously you want to avoid this, but after writing a graphics library htcw_gfx and writing a ton of drivers for many different displays, I've never had any issues running the backlight off the ESP32's 3.3v pin when plugged into USB, or even on LiPO.

Thx, interesting. Made me G**gle it: https://github.com/codewitch-honey-crisis/gfx

Try out https://github.com/codewitch-honey-crisis/gfx - it works very well on monochrome displays and is lighter than LVGL.

for the record: https://github.com/memononen/nanosvg

You might be interested in NanoSVG: *"NanoSVG is a simple stupid single-header-file SVG parse. The output of the parser is a list of cubic bezier shapes.".

SVG (.svg , .svgz ) - SVGs are rasterized using NanoSVG when importing them. Support is limited; complex vectors may not render correctly. For complex vectors, rendering them to PNGs using Inkscape is often a better solution. This can be automated thanks to its command-line interface.