cobib VS bibcure

Compare cobib vs bibcure and see what are their differences.

bibcure

Bibcure helps in boring tasks by keeping your bibfile up to date and normalized...also allows you to easily download all papers inside your bibtex (by bibcure)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
cobib bibcure
1 1
37 193
- 2.1%
9.1 10.0
6 days ago over 1 year ago
Python Python
MIT License GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

cobib

Posts with mentions or reviews of cobib. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-01.

bibcure

Posts with mentions or reviews of bibcure. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-07.
  • Papis 0.13: A CLI document and bibliography manager
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 May 2023
    You don't normally need to enter metadata manually. You can import it using the publication's doi, arxiv etc. Then papis gives you an opportunity to review and update the metadata. The other functionality that papis provides is a quick search through titles, authors etc.

    Of course much of that can be done with doi2bib [0], arxiv2bib [1], etc., which you can combine with the wonderful bibtool [2] to keep a clean bibtex file. That's what I use and the advantage of this over papis is that you can version control it.

    That said papis has its use. It's less heavy than zotero, a bit less proprietary format (the info is stored in yaml files iirc) and it provides a layer over bibtex. If it had full text indexing and search I could see myself using it more.

    [0] https://github.com/bibcure/bibcure

    [1] https://nathangrigg.github.io/arxiv2bib/

    [2] https://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/en/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing cobib and bibcure you can also consider the following projects:

papis - Powerful and highly extensible command-line based document and bibliography manager.

bibtex-autocomplete - Python package to autocomplete bibtex bibliographies

pdf2doi - A python library/command-line tool to extract the DOI or other identifiers of a scientific paper from a pdf file.

PaperTools - Tools for writing papers

cobib

cli-apps - The largest Awesome Curated list of CLI/TUI applications with source data organized into CSV files