cluster-api-provider-kubemark
cluster-api-provider-hetzner
| cluster-api-provider-kubemark | cluster-api-provider-hetzner | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 54 | 509 | |
| - | 4.3% | |
| 6.7 | 9.5 | |
| 5 days ago | 1 day ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cluster-api-provider-kubemark
cluster-api-provider-hetzner
-
Bare-Metal Kubernetes, Part I: Talos on Hetzner
Hetzner Cloud is officially supported, but that means setting up VPSs in Hetzner's Cloud offering, whereas this project was intended as a more or less independent pure bare-metal cluster. I see they offer Bare Metal support as well, but I haven't dived too deep into it.
I haven't used KubeOne, but I have previously used Syself's https://github.com/syself/cluster-api-provider-hetzner which I believe works in a similar fashion. I think the approach is very interesting and plays right into the Kubernetes Operator playbook and its self-healing ambitions.
That being said, the complexity of the approach, probably in trying to span and resolve inconsistencies across such a wide landscape of providers, caused me quite a bit of grief. I eventually abandoned this approach after having some operator somewhere consistently attempt and fail to spin up a secondary control plane VPS against my wishes. After poring over loads of documentation and half a dozen CRDs in an attempt to resolve it, I threw in my hat.
Of course, Kubermatic is not Syself, and this was about a year ago, so it is entirely possible that both projects are absolutely superb solutions to the problem at this point.
-
Fly.io Postgres cluster went down for 3 days, no word from them about it
For anyone interested in Kubernetes on Hetzner, there's a really interesting CAPI provider being actively developed:
https://github.com/syself/cluster-api-provider-hetzner
- Syself: Cluster API Provider Hetzner released
- Cluster API Provider Hetzner released
-
How many of you are running kubernetes on prem?
Just a hint running ML Workloads on Hetzner is pretty cheap! You could use for managing k8s: https://github.com/syself/cluster-api-provider-hetzner
-
Syself cluster-api-provider Hetzner v1.0.0-beta.16
we (Syself) release Cluster-API Provider Hetzner v1.0.0-beta.16.
-
NEW ARM-BASED CLOUD SERVER
ah okay they come from the upstream cluster-api project. The caph project implements only the infrastructure provider part of Cluster API.
-
Has anyone set up autoscaling on hetzner?
you can easily use it with https://github.com/syself/cluster-api-provider-hetzner
- Image digest of Go 1.19.7 changed?
-
What's the most sane way to operate a K8s cluster?
I would use cluster-api-provider-hetzner from Syself.
What are some alternatives?
cluster-api - Home for Cluster API, a subproject of sig-cluster-lifecycle
kubeone - Kubermatic KubeOne automate cluster operations on all your cloud, on-prem, edge, and IoT environments.
free-tier-gke - Get your very own GKE cluster for next to nothing!
hcloud-cloud-controller-manager - Kubernetes cloud-controller-manager for Hetzner Cloud
cluster-api-provider-vsphere
cluster-api-k3s - Cluster API k3s
steampipe-plugin-hcloud - Use SQL to instantly query servers, networks and more from Hetzner Cloud. Open source CLI. No DB required.
addon-controller - Sveltos Kubernetes add-on controller programmatically deploys add-ons and applications in tens of clusters. Support for ClusterAPI powered clusters, Helm charts, kustomize ,YAMLs. Sveltos has built-in support for multi-tenancy.
resotonotebook
sbom-operator - Catalogue all images of a Kubernetes cluster to multiple targets with Syft
microk8s - MicroK8s is a small, fast, single-package Kubernetes for datacenters and the edge.