cloudnative-pg VS openapi-generator

My holiday project was doing another pass at my Homelab Kubernetes cluster, part of which involved switching to a proper operator to manage Postgres. Coincidentally, I setup cloudnative-pg (https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg) yesterday.

https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/issues/13

/? logical replication:

https://www.google.com/search?q=logical+replication

pgadmin docs > Publication Dialog; logical replication: https://www.pgadmin.org/docs/pgadmin4/development/publicatio...

https://github.com/dalibo/pg_activity#faq ; pip install `pg_activity[psychopg]` :

> FAQ: I can't see my queries only TPS is shown

Only the TPS

(How) Do any ~pg_top tools delineate logical replication activity?

pgcenter > PostgreSQL statistics [virtual tables] (and also /proc)

We already had backup and recovery using object storage, but we are working to support VolumeSnapshots taking care to properly shut down the instance first! This awesome PR is laying the foundation for it, it's adding a subcommand to our kubectl plugin to manually perform a backup using VolumeSnapshots and adding support for restoring a Cluster from it, next step will be adding it to the ScheduledBackup/Backup resources too!

I'll ask in their slack channel later. I've also opened a discussion regarding this on github if you are interesed. https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/discussions/2030

This has a bunch of side-effects that break usual expectations around scheduling. For instance, cluster scale-down (for maintenance etc.) is blocked unless a specific taint has been added to each database pod. In addition, if the underlying node does fail, your cluster will be stuck in fail-over state until you manually delete the underlying pods. I think there are definitely other gotchas around this decision to use a custom controller but I have only tested this on GKE.

Another option would be https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg I got to see this talk at Kubecon last month that might be of use to you too -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99uSJXkKpeI That talk is run in part by EDB, who are the company behind CloudNativePG, they are talking about their commercial offering, but the principle is the same.

Following another post on this sub, I was checking out the Github project and landed on this 2864 lined CRD https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/blob/main/config/crd/bases/postgresql.cnpg.io_clusters.yaml. How are sane people reading these files?

**NOTE**: I am a maintainer of CloudNativePG.

Disclaimer: We're an early adopter of Stainless at Mux.

I've spent more of my time than I'd like to admit managing both OpenAPi spec files [1] and fighting with openapi-generator [2] than any sane person should have to. While it's great having the freedom to change the templates an thus generated SDKs you get with using that sort of approach, it's also super time consuming, and when you have a lot of SDKs (we have 6 generated SDKs), in my experience it needs someone devoted to managing the process, staying up with template changes etc.

Excited to see more SDK languages come to Stainless!

[1] https://www.mux.com/blog/an-adventure-in-openapi-v3-api-code...

[2] https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator

As a result, the following specification can be used to generate clients in a number of different languages via OpenAPI Generator.

Of course you can compile the server from source if you have Go and the OpenAPI generator JAR (https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator?tab=readme...)

Follow these steps : https://github.com/c100k/rebootx-on-prem/blob/master/.github...

And then :

(cd ./impl/http-server-go && GOARCH=amd64 GOOS=openbsd go build -o /app/rebootx-on-prem-http-server-go-openbsd-amd64 -v)

By adapting the arch if needed. Not tested, but it should work.

TL;DR: Start generating your HTTP clients and all the DTOs of the requests and responses automatically from your API, using openapi-generator instead of writing your own.

As an alternative, you can also use the official OpenAPI Generator, which is a more generic tool supporting a wide range of languages and frameworks.

I trialed generating SDKs using the OpenAPI Generator package, which was largely unsatisfactory.

If Swagger/OpenAPI is available, save yourself a lot of trouble and generate the client using OpenAPI Generator. If not, use a library like RestEase to make it significantly easier to create the client.

For a run of the mill REST API you should generate OpenAPI (Swagger) info for the API using a library like NSwag or Swashbuckle. You'd want to do this no matter what because it's documentation for the API, but the bonus is that you can use it with tools like OpenAPI Generator to create API client code and models in a variety of languages. You certainly can create an API client library manually, it would entail having a nuget package with a class library that contains the models and client code for calling the endpoints (which I'd create using a lib such as RestEase unless you just enjoy writing boilerplate code by hand). However 95% of the time it simply isn't worth creating your own lib when OpenAPI is available because once you've done it a time or two it takes less than 5 min to run the generator and create (or update) a lib.

Then you can use oapi-codegen or openapi-generator to generate the Go (or other language) SDK for it.