cloudcmd
pupcloud
cloudcmd | pupcloud | |
---|---|---|
10 | 8 | |
1,776 | 131 | |
- | - | |
9.3 | 0.0 | |
18 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
JavaScript | Svelte | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cloudcmd
-
What's your web browser based access to file system?
I assume it is this one: https://cloudcmd.io/
- Cloud Commander
-
Ask HN
Personally, and I can't name a tool for you, I consider that:
- files&folder taxonomies are limited. Sometimes a file should be in more than one place, there are links/symlinks but no "backlinks" so it's easy top break things and filenames are not much good for search. Essentially a path in a file&folder classic taxonomy is a kind of limited and limited query to reach some content;
- notes are another interesting things: ALL documents are kind of notes. The fact we have many file formats and apps just to craft document is more a limit and an issue of modern systems that a reasonable thing.
Given the above two consideration I decide for myself to org-attach almost anything. The complete setup is:
- org-roam, org-ql (with a semi-curated catalog to make queries and yasnippets to ensure consistency) and ripgrep as access layer, witch practically means hitting a single key on my keyboard and start typing something. In 99% of the case I get "the good answer" (something already done or new content to add), sometimes I need rg/recoll because just heading/tags search do not work and in that case I adjust/add some roam_aliases to easy mach the content in the future. Sometimes I need queries to work on things, like "check all active contracts" or "current issue" or "last three days notes" etc;
- org-attach and links and dired to craft small "secondary-level file hierarchies" as a storage management layers, something that hide my real home taxonomy (essentially just notes on one root, other files managed by org-attach under another in a cache-like tree) I access via links;
- various org-mode extras to link different kind of stuff I can't org-attach properly, like mails (individual messages, threads, search queries on my mails etc), transactions (hledger via org-babel), mere elisp:(sexp) code to be executed live on click.
Doing so allow me to IGNORE a limited and limited hierarchy, allow crafting dynamic hierarchies as results from SQL-alike (albeit limited and slow) queries, accessing most of the content in search&narrow style something proven to be effective in most kind of UI from search engines to "dashes" instead of "menus" etc and allow to blend a bit most kind of docs in a single "document"/page/live environment witch is VERY useful since we have a single mind, not really compartmentalized and we need different kind of "docs" together often.
This is IMVHO how we should manage files in 2022 BUT since Emacs and classic desktop model for commercial and ignorance reasons is essentially dead it's not something ready out-of-the-box and not something designed for collaboration. It's just a personal HYPER-effective solution that might wrap&hide far less effective one used by collaborators still allowing interaction.
The modern equivalent, far more limited, complex and heavyweight is a DMS (see Nuxeo, Alfresco, ...) mostly crappy WebUIs that wrap Apache Jackrabbit behind the scene and add some forms/tags/ways to classify documents in various "dynamic" and "less constrained" ways. With a bit of hesitation for a small team https://www.tagspaces.org is less crazy to setup and use. Othe simpler but probably too limited options are https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser or https://cloudcmd.io/ or https://filerun.com/ or https://www.seafile.com/ or https://tabbles.net/ some are proprietary and all are not much more than classic file browsers served via webapp on a file-server backend storage instead of a local one.
-
Your top 5 best self hosted apps?
Cloud Commander - Web based remote file manager, while there are a handful of them it's the one I keep coming back to.
-
Best way to move files around on OMV5 - from A GUI
Fire up a Docker container of cloudcmd, map your volumes, and go nuts.
- Cloud Commander – Cloud file manager with console and editor
-
Looking for a simple web based file browser for Ubuntu
check out Cloudcommander (like MC but in a browser)
-
Self Hosted Weekly Roundup #2
You should have a look at cloudcmd. It's a browser-based file manager with drag&drop which also offers an SSH shell/terminal emulation.
-
Real hidden gems when it comes to self hosting
Cloudcmd - browser-based ssh terminal and file manager (read: byobu, screen, and all the other terminal apps like taskbook, now count as being 'self-hosted') - - there are a few browser-based RDP programs like Apache Guacamole Server, but I haven't tried them (yet).
-
Is there a file manager similar to synologys "file station"
Cloudcmd?
pupcloud
-
Pupcloud v0.8.0 and many thanks
Yes, mobile browsers don't implement that... unfortunately there isn't much I can do, but if you hit the download button, it should open in a separate tab. See a discussion related to this here.
-
Looking for a simple web based file browser for Ubuntu
I have been giving Pupcloud a try. It is in active development and is quite usable.
-
What is the best way to share a file hosted in my server available with anyone?
https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud can do exactly that
-
Filerun - Self Hosted Cloud Storage
Pupcloud is a new application I'm trying. It lacks a lot of features but is is blazing fast and was just released last week.
-
Pupcloud: point-and-click web filesystem browser
Hi! I'd like to gather some feedback on a small project of mine, pupcloud (github - demo - docs - dockerhub).
-
New (or not?) idea: Cross-platform GUI using golang as backend and Svelte as frontend
I'm following this approach in my latest pet project (https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud), and it's really good for me... separating frontend and backend allow for a much cleaner "context switch", and both svelte and go are top notch. I don't have a big enough mind to fit all the complexity of other languages/frameworks, but the sum of go+svelte aren't many concepts to work with, and it's refreshing. let me concentrate on what I want to do.
What are some alternatives?
filemanager - 📂 Web File Browser
Filestash - 🦄 A modern web client for SFTP, S3, FTP, WebDAV, Git, Minio, LDAP, CalDAV, CardDAV, Mysql, Backblaze, ...
updog - Updog is a replacement for Python's SimpleHTTPServer. It allows uploading and downloading via HTTP/S, can set ad hoc SSL certificates and use http basic auth.
solid - Solid - Re-decentralizing the web (project directory)
Code-Server - VS Code in the browser
easy-cozy - Easy cozy-cloud deployment
budibase - Budibase is an open-source low code platform that helps you build internal tools in minutes 🚀
cryptgeon - cryptgeon is a secure, open source note / file sharing service inspired by PrivNote written in rust & svelte.
speedtest - Self-hosted Speed Test for HTML5 and more. Easy setup, examples, configurable, mobile friendly. Supports PHP, Node, Multiple servers, and more
fasthttp - Fast HTTP package for Go. Tuned for high performance. Zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 10x faster than net/http
marktext - 📝A simple and elegant markdown editor, available for Linux, macOS and Windows.
tauri - Build smaller, faster, and more secure desktop applications with a web frontend.