claudie VS Xline

Claudie simplifies the process of programmatically establishing Kubernetes clusters across multiple cloud vendors and on-premises datacenters. It provides a centralized management interface for provisioning and managing clusters, eliminating the need for manual configuration and maintenance. Claudie's capabilities include:

I'm one of the authors of https://github.com/berops/claudie

There's also Hetzner bootstrapping information specifically here: https://github.com/berops/claudie/blob/master/docs/input-manifest/providers/hetzner.md

The CURP paper doesn't define a new leader election algorithm and presumes you use an existing one like raft. Xline is using raft based on the readme

https://github.com/xline-kv/Xline/tree/master/curp/tla%2B

warning, I skimmed and ctrl-fd for "leader election"

Hi! We are developing an distributed KV database named Xline, which uses the CURP protocol to achieve up to a 50% reduction in latency compared to traditional distributed databases. As someone who is not well-versed in blockchain technology, I am curious to know whether low latency is the primary concern or if other factors are more important in this field?

Implement a storage engine layer to abstract the concrete storage engine, like rocksdb , and enable upper layer storage function (#185, #187)