citation-file-format
schema
citation-file-format | schema | |
---|---|---|
8 | 2 | |
426 | 178 | |
1.4% | 2.8% | |
6.7 | 0.0 | |
about 1 month ago | over 1 year ago | |
Python | Python | |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
citation-file-format
-
Qsv: Efficient CSV CLI Toolkit
I am somewhat tickled at the thought of citing everything in a malicious compliance kind of way. Given a Nix environment, it should be possible to pull down a list of every bit of code that was used to construct the OS. Would we have to differentiate between installed vs executed code? My Latex environment probably has thousands of packages, though I might directly only include a handful of them. Even if I include a Latex package, it might not get executed.
The CITATION.cff format[0] is a newish format to solve the machine identification of citable works, but I suspect it is too new to see widespread adoption. It is going to take some backbreaking regexes to extract "How to Cite" sections embedded in READMEs and buried in the source.
[0] https://citation-file-format.github.io/
-
Beautify your GitHub repo
The standard CITATION format is the Citation File Format, proposed by GitHub:
-
Citation File Format
Ah, I missed the fields that would help you define that info on “definition.reference”. https://github.com/citation-file-format/citation-file-format...
Clearly I’m not the person who built the connector if I missed that :)
-
Hacker News top posts: Aug 21, 2021
Citation File Format\ (28 comments)
schema
-
About Citation Files on GitHub
* the citation plugin for Obsidian, which uses CSL-JSON [^4]
This might in the end be my personal preference, but a standardized JSON format (which is just as easily adaptable to YAML [^5]) seems much easier to parse and modify than Bibtex, with its sheer complexity. If we want to have the ability to easily cite anything, then this direction of standardization, I believe, is a must.
[^1]: https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema#csl-json-s...
-
Citation File Format
CSL doesn't appear to support software as a 'type' of thing, which it has a hardcoded list of options[0]. Of course, maybe they should have just fixed an existing format instead of creating a new one.
[0] https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/blob/maste...
What are some alternatives?
UEFI-Editor - Aptio V UEFI Editor: an alternative to AMIBCP
obsidian-citation-plugin - Obsidian plugin which integrates your academic reference manager with the Obsidian editor. Search your references from within Obsidian and automatically create and reference literature notes for papers and books.
ruby-cff - A Ruby library for manipulating CITATION.cff files.
csl-ruby - Citation Style Language (CSL) API for Ruby
fugashi - A Cython MeCab wrapper for fast, pythonic Japanese tokenization and morphological analysis.
citeproc-js - A JavaScript implementation of the Citation Style Language (CSL) https://citeproc-js.readthedocs.io
aurora - Malware similarity platform with modularity in mind.
pubs - Your bibliography on the command line
KeenWrite - Free, open-source, cross-platform desktop Markdown text editor with live preview, string interpolation, and math.
janet - A dynamic language and bytecode vm
citeproc - CSL citation processing library in Haskell