ci VS Travis CI.com

APPVEYOR: Appveyor is an open source project builder. It works good for GITHUB repositories. The user can login to the actual VM. For more info: https://www.appveyor.com/

appveyor.com — CD service for Windows, free for Open Source

AppVeyor (GitLab/Gitea)

If you don't have an access to Mac or PC you can bundle your app for all three platforms with AppVeyor - Continuous Integration service for Windows, Linux and macOS. In short, Continuous Integration (CI) is an automated process of building, testing and deploying (Continuous Delivery - CD) application on every push to a repository.

I then do my building on a CI/CD service that offers Windows VMs free to open-source projects, with Appveyor being the first I'm aware of to start doing so.

Appveyor does as well. https://www.appveyor.com/

We were also using AppVeyor for CI during the early periods of the library and I managed to add a step at the end of the CI pipeline to do a NuGet publish, when a tag was created in GitHub. This completely removed any human error or any inadvertent omissions due to lack of time etc. This worked well for us other than the occasional NuGet publish failures due to expired API key. We had to jump into AppVeyor dashboard to see what was going on and fix things. Eventually, we migrated all the CI builds to use GitHub actions so that we can lookup things all in one-place without logging into different systems. This is a huge convenience and time saver for us. We settled on doing a manual GitHub action trigger (user invoked) especially for publishing NuGet packages rather than keep it automated so that we can inspect and keep an eye on the NuGet publish as it happens after we tag and add a release in GitHub.

I thing yes. Personally i'm use powershell scripts to deploy things via appveyor and to run something locally via task scheduler.

Can't cross-build to the MSVC or macOS targets without a license to use the Microsoft or Apple C/C++ developer tools for the final linkage against the platform libraries... and I believe even the free ones require you to have a valid license for Windows or own a Macintosh. (This can be worked around by building your release artifacts on a free-for-open-source CI/CD service like Appveyor or using the MinGW target for Windows if you don't need to link to MSVC-built libraries.)

Script source: https://github.com/appveyor/ci/blob/master/scripts/enterprise/grant_logon_as_service.ps1

Travis CI: This hosted CI/CD service can seamlessly integrate with code hosting platforms like GitHub.

TRAVIS: With the help of Travis CI, you can easily synchronize your GITHUB projects. Travis offers more language support than circleCI and also you can run test on linux and mac OS at the same time. For more info: https://travis-ci.org/

Automation is a critical tool for improving DevOps efficiency. Many cloud platforms offer enhanced automation solutions for DevOps activities, such as CI/CD. CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab, and Travis CI are all examples of such tools used for continuous integration. These technologies provide uniformity and speed while requiring minimal human intervention.

And finally, the engineers need to be able to easily deploy to Kubernetes, which can either be done with the same tools or with specialized CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins, Circle CI, or Travis CI.

To deploy an application to production, more complex continuous integration and deployment solutions exist. Since Kubernetes is so common now that almost all CI/CD tools support it, it does not really matter if these solutions are particularly specialized on Kubernetes or not. You should rather compare different solutions again and see which best fits your needs. A good starting point are these tools: Jenkins, Codefresh, Travis CI, and Circle CI.

And it became quite a good conversation like, well, I wish that it would also update my GitHub Actions tree because of my Travis CI tree because I wish it did this, I wish it did that. I think the biggest users were the WG, the browser rendering engine people. They had some requirements they couldn't use until they were fixed. So we had a really good conversation there. But yeah, tech is never the hard part; it's always the people.

This tool is written in Golang and still used travis-ci as CI. Furthermore, some parts of the release process were still manually, such as uploading the assets to a GitHub release and generating the release notes. We wanted to have this automated.

You should use a service like Travis CI. Much easier than the route you are taking.

https://fastlane.tools https://danger.systems https://www.sonarqube.org https://codemagic.io/ https://travis-ci.org

Datree has really good integration with CicleCi, TravisCi, GitHub Actions, GitLab also.