cherrybomb VS rswag

Standard library does not provide all solutions for Error Handling.. In fact, different errors may be returned by the same function, making it increasingly difficult to handle them precisely. Personal anecdote, in our company we developed Cherrybomb an API security tool written in Rust, and we need to re-write a good part of it to have a better errors handling.

Cherrybomb is a CLI tool that helps you avoid undefined user behavior by auditing your API specifications, validating them, and running API security tests.

If you're looking for a new way to understand and manage your API, consider using OpenAPI, and if you want to secure it consider using CherryBomb to automate your security test. Managing and Testing it's the key,now your can keep your API safe :)

You can find the code on GitHub: https://github.com/blst-security/cherrybomb

API validation is an important part of developing and releasing a new API. It helps to ensure that the API behaves as expected and that it meets all the requirements of its users. Validating an API can be made easier with automated testing tools and CI/CD integrated validation 💡 tools, but it can also be done by hand.

You can learn more about Cherrybomb and how it can help you over at its repository.

I believe that Cherrybomb will make it simpler for developers to construct application programming interfaces (APIs) that are standardized, well-documented, and straightforward to implement. We have high hopes that Cherrybomb will emerge as the industry standard for application programming interface (API) development.

We will be creating a "Coffee Ordering API" using Ruby on Rails, and using a tool called rswag to create tests that verify the behaviour of our API and generate an OpenAPI reference.

Made a library a while back that helped me write JSON schemas for rswag. Hope others find it useful!

Forem, which is a Ruby on Rails app, integrates Swagger via a gem - the rswag gem. The rswag Ruby gem allows us to create a Swagger-based DSL for describing and testing our API operations. It also extends rspec-rails "request specs”, hence, allowing our documentation to be a part of our test suite which allows us to make requests with test parameters and seed data that invoke different response codes. As a result, we are able to test what the requests and responses look like, however we do not test the business logic that drives the endpoint - that is tested elsewhere in the code.

Using something like rswag will give you some ability, in the specs, to also describe the endpoints and auto-generate some documentation.

Hello! I would like to autogenerate API documentation for my Ruby on Rails Application. However, all of the solutions I've found such as https://github.com/rswag/rswag and https://github.com/richhollis/swagger-docs involve writing tests or manually describing the endpoint responses. I am hoping to find something similar to Swashbuckle for ASP.Net Core but for Ruby on Rails. Below is an example of using Swashbuckle's ASP.NET Core to autogenerate Swagger API documentation. The response type is inferred form the return type of the action.

https://github.com/rswag/rswag - helps generate Swagger documentation (you can upload it to an external service, like readme.com or serve from your Rails app)

rswag expands the "request specifications" of rspec-rails with a Swagger-based DSL for defining and testing API activities. - Github

Hello guys, I'm working on a rails (4.x) project, trying to implement a way to create docs for OpenApi 3 and Swagger (I started to learn rails in october last year), this project has like 6 years old, a lot of endpoints and very poor documentation, my first option is Rswag, does anyone knows a good example project for these gem?

I'm using the Rswag gem to document my API. Right now I have a WIP here: https://cabal-fintech.herokuapp.com/api-docs/v1/swagger.json but whenever I try to validate it on the swagger validator I get an error not even understandable to me, as that route doesn't need [params].item