ca-archive
chromium
Our great sponsors
ca-archive | chromium | |
---|---|---|
45 | 224 | |
480 | 17,574 | |
- | 2.6% | |
0.0 | 10.0 | |
over 2 years ago | 5 days ago | |
JavaScript | ||
- | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ca-archive
-
Ask HN: How can we help Firefox not to dissapear?
»
https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive
A lot of people care a lot. 15,000 developers falsifies your ludicrous "no one in the world cares about.
Like many others, you are mixing up "I don't care" with "nobody cares", and you are wrong.
-
Does anyone know if there is a XKit Rewritten equivalent for Pale Moon?
No, it's impossible. PM doesn't support Web Extensions. You can look at the more than 200 extensions on the PM addons site, or legacy XUL addons on CAA (maybe even an older version of the one you mentioned).
-
Mimicking the Pale Moon Effect in Older Versions of Firefox
You will not be able to use addons from addons.mozilla because they use google Web Extensions and not the more powerful XUL addons they started with. There are many addons available for Pale Moon though https://addons.palemoon.org/extensions/ (even older firefox ones: https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive)
- Best alternatives to Firefox 56.0.2?
-
which has the most extensions
Because they're more powerful, meaning you can change and customize more things. That doesn't translate to basic, so you're way off there. It's also not only Pale Moon's own https://addons.palemoon.org/extensions/ but they include https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive as well (all firefox addons before they became extensions).
-
How to change bookmark icons?
Not without an extension, you can install the Classic Addons Archive and look for one there.
-
addons containers zoom tool
Install CAA and search for Priv8 on it, and look at NoSquint.
- Basilisk Has A Cool Logo And It's Still Being Maintained
-
Question for Pale Moon users
7) I don't really use translation add-ons so don't think I could be of help you with this, sorry. There's an add-on listed on the official add-ons site called BabbleOn, but I think that only just redirects websites to their Google Translated version. Note though that if you can't find an add-on that suit your needs, there's always the option of using the Classic Add-ons Archive to search for the add-on that does. Anyway, I'd like to address the following:
- Any other browsers with tab tiling inside the window like Vivaldi
chromium
-
Demystifying the Shadow DOM
One of the unexpected use of shadow DOMs for me was a document generated for image resource URLs [1], because the HTML standard apparently specifies the exact DOM structure of the generated document except for the `` element [2].
[1] https://github.com/chromium/chromium/blob/f02ca73/third_part...
[2] https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/document-lifecycle.ht...
-
Detect when your installed Chrome extensions have changed owners
Recently my favorite open source mouse gestures extension SmartUp Gestures was taken over by some shady entity (with github no longer being updated of course).
I opened Chrome ticket that they should ask to re-enable extension when ownership changes. They just closed the ticket replying with this link:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/extens...
:(
-
Supermium – Chromium fork for Win 2003 and newer
Hmm. It looks like files with the .lnk or .pif file extension can only be downloaded on a user gesture: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/39841e54180...
So it can't be done silently. Although, I do wish the type was marked "DANGEROUS" a la dll files.
-
New Linux glibc flaw lets attackers get root on major distros
On Linux, Chromium uses setuid or user namespaces to restrict the access of sandboxed components and seccomp-bpf to reduce the kernel attack surface.
Check out the Chromium docs on this topic: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/docs/l...
-
Microsoft Edge ignores user wishes, slurps tabs from Chrome without permission
You can also disable JIT in Firefox by setting javascript.options.baselinejit to false in about:config, although you won't get CET.
[1] https://github.com/chromium/chromium/blob/12c232c43ce7324d30...
-
Apple Announces Changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union
Chromium targets iOS already: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/i...
- We build X.509 chains so you don't have to
-
Google Is Tracking You Even in Incognito Mode, New Disclaimer Is Up
For the sake of completeness, I've traced the evolution of the notice over time:
From 2008-07-26: "Going incognito doesn't affect the behavior of other people, servers, or software. Be wary of: / • Websites that collect or share information about you / • Internet service providers or employers that track the pages you visit / • Malicious software that tracks your keystrokes in exchange for free smileys / • Surveillance by secret agents / • People standing behind you" (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/09911bf300f...)
From 2013-12-07: "Going incognito doesn't affect the behavior of other people, servers, software, or people standing behind you." (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c5e36c57178...)
From 2013-12-13: "However, you aren't invisible. Going incognito doesn't hide your browsing from your employer, your internet service provider, or the websites you visit." (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/70821506825...)
From 2014-02-27: "However, you aren't invisible. Going incognito doesn't hide your browsing from your employer, your internet service provider, governments and other sophisticated attackers, or the websites you visit." (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/ab54bd65701...)
From 2014-04-29: "Going incognito doesn't hide your browsing from your employer, your internet service provider, or the websites you visit." (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/eb09a62ef40...)
From 2016-01-15: "However, you aren't invisible. Going incognito doesn’t hide your browsing from your employer, your internet service provider, or the websites you visit." (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/b7dac1a6a79...)
From 2017-02-27: "Your activity might still be visible to: / • Websites you visit / • Your employer / • Your internet service provider" (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/cfe102adddc...)
From 2017-03-29: "Your activity might still be visible to: / • Websites you visit / • Your employer or school / • Your internet service provider" (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/7ca3ccf74e8...)
(Note that some of these were behind a feature flag for a few months.) Also, it looks like they've been intending to modify the new-tab page text for Incognito windows for some time, as part of the "Revamped Incognito NTP" project. You can view the modified text with 'chromium --enable-features=IncognitoNtpRevamp':
From 2021-08-13: "What Incognito doesn't do / Incognito does not make you invisible online: / • Sites know when you visit them / • Employers or schools can track browsing activity / • Internet service providers may monitor web traffic" (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/e6ae57ba385...)
From 2022-01-25: "What Incognito doesn't do / Incognito does not make you invisible online: / • Sites and the services they use can see visits / • Employers or schools can track browsing activity / • Internet service providers can monitor web traffic" (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/8b349f6c984...)
-
What Progressive Web App (PWA) Can Do Today
Blink can now be compiled for iOS, but without JIT or WASM:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/i...
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=141170...
-
People like me are why you shouldn't run a hosting company
I think its weird that Vercel has this limit. There is no practical reason I can think of for having such a limit on URL characters that is so small. Chrome suggests a 2MB limit[0] for example. The platform itself doesn't have one, and Firefox I believe if memory serves (I can't find the source for this claim atm) is 1 MB effectively, and I don't think Safari is any lower than that either (and may well be more inline with Chrome on this, at 2 MB)
[0]: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs...
What are some alternatives?
uBlock-for-firefox-legacy - uBlock Origin for Firefox legacy-based browsers.
ungoogled-chromium - Google Chromium, sans integration with Google
extension-pack - @adisakshya's extension-pack for VS Code & Code Server
WebKit - Home of the WebKit project, the browser engine used by Safari, Mail, App Store and many other applications on macOS, iOS and Linux.
moon-tester-tool - Tool for testing compatibility of add-ons with Pale Moon
termux-packages - A package build system for Termux.
scriptlet-doctor - Allow inline scripts regardless of site policy
bromite - Bromite is a Chromium fork with ad blocking and privacy enhancements; take back your browser!
Male-Poon - [UnavailableForLegalReasons - Repository access blocked]
brave-browser - Brave browser for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows.
beaker - An experimental peer-to-peer Web browser
gecko-dev - Read-only Git mirror of the Mercurial gecko repositories at https://hg.mozilla.org. How to contribute: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/contributing/contribution_quickref.html