bytebase VS Gatsby

We have been building https://github.com/bytebase/bytebase for 3+ years. You can think it of as GitHub/GitLab for SQL changes, with integrated GitOps, code review and deployment.

You can further check out this tutorial to get a feel of our GitOps solution

https://www.bytebase.com/docs/tutorials/database-change-mana...

We have been working on bytebase (https://github.com/bytebase/bytebase) for 3+ years to address this. With a change review workflow, environment propagations, and try not to disturb the dev flow if possible.

Migrations. All my database logic lives in version control.

Popular tooling like Phoenix, Hasura, etc have good built in migration stories.

https://www.bytebase.com looks really promising.

Hover, I do struggle with one big issue: changing database logic (views, functions, etc) that has other logic dependent on it. This seems like a solvable problem.

bytebase.com — Database CI/CD and DevOps. Free under 20 users and ten database instances

Bytebase offers a powerful GUI for schema migration deployments. This tutorial will show you how to use Bytebase to deploy schema migrations with features like SQL Review, custom approval, time scheduling, and more.

Now there are more subdivided practice: * Policy as Code: Sentinel, OPA * Database as Code: bytebase * AppConfiguration as Code: KusionStack, Acorn * ...... (Welcome to add more)

Bytebase is an open-source Database DevOps and CI/CD tool for teams, designed to centralize the control and secure your organization’s most valuable asset, the database data.

I use Bytebase to manage database changes for MySQL with GitOps workflow. I can manage my SQL scripts in my GitLab repo, and trigger a database change issue with committing a MR. Then Bytebase will record it after the issue is executed successfully. But I am not sure whether it supports procedures. Refer to https://github.com/bytebase/bytebase to get more details.

The first time I started building static websites is when I discovered Gatsby. I built several projects using Gatsby and hosted it on Netlify free tier. It felt like a really robust architecture and I loved that it was free.

A Gatsby site uses Gatsby, which leverages React and GraphQL to create fast and optimized web experiences. Gatsby is often used for building static websites, progressive web apps (PWAs), and even full-blown dynamic web applications.

While Next.js is a powerful framework for building server-rendered React applications, it's not the only option for developers looking to create high-performance websites. One notable alternative is Gatsby, a static site generator that leverages React and GraphQL.

The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19 and RSCs are part of the Stable version. However, for now, Next.js is currently the only framework recommended in the official React docs that supports server components.

GatsbyjsCMS - Gatsby is the fast and flexible framework that makes building websites with any CMS, API, or database fun again. Build and deploy headless websites that drive more traffic, convert better, and earn more revenue!

GatsbyJS

Babel plugins are everywhere. From being used to remove unwanted exports from files in Gatsby to being used to disallow users from doing re-exports in Nextjs.

In terms of GitHub stars, SSGs like Next.js, Hugo, Gatsby, Docusaurus, Nuxt.js, and Jekyll top the list. Some popular SSGs even host conferences and workshops, providing resources and networking opportunities for those looking to explore more advanced topics in depth.

Flexibility : Developers have complete control over the frontend so they can use their preferred tools and frameworks like React, Next.js, Gatsby, or Remix.