Buildbot
woodpecker
Our great sponsors
| Buildbot | woodpecker | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 5,166 | 3,694 | |
| 0.3% | 4.1% | |
| 9.9 | 9.9 | |
| 7 days ago | about 7 hours ago | |
| Python | Go | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Buildbot
-
CI/CD server that is lean and runs without docker (or can use Podman rather easily)?
I can put in a word for Buildbot, which I've been using for years across multiple projects. It doesn't depend on Docker, it is written in Python, and we use it with some FreeBSD machines too. I think the main downside compared to others is the configuration, which can easily become overwhelming if you're not a developer. It's a Python script, which means it is extremely versatile, and adaptable to any use-case you can think of.
woodpecker
-
The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works
https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker
-
Examples of Woodpecker (CI/CD) pipelines for .NET
Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.
-
regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker
-
GitHub: “Human eyes” will never see the contents of your private repositories
> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline
I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/
Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/
I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...
- Woodpecker CI: simple, extensible CI engine powered by Docker
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io
-
GitHub actions top alternatives
https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].
I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].
[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
JSON vs XML
The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/
- Woodpecker
What are some alternatives?
Jenkins - A static site for the Jenkins automation server
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
Concourse - Concourse is a container-based continuous thing-doer written in Go.
gitlab-runner
GitlabCi
github-act-runner - act as self-hosted runner
CDS - Enterprise-Grade Continuous Delivery & DevOps Automation Open Source Platform
Go - Main repository for GoCD - Continuous Delivery server
onedev - Git Server with CI/CD, Kanban, and Packages. Seamless integration. Unparalleled experience.