bitcracker VS blender-cuda-subdivision-surface-gpu

Clean reinstall. Or try bitcracker : https://github.com/e-ago/bitcracker

This is correct, you can bypass Bitlocker if it uses a password instead of or in addition to the 48-digit encryption key. You're looking for this: https://github.com/e-ago/bitcracker unless there's a newer version. This is what I've used in the past.

but yeah, as the others have said you can definitely mount a windows drive on linux. I prefer using gparted cause you can visualize the partitions, but testdisk and photorec can also provide insights into the partition sizes and can do full data recovery on the non-encrypted partitions. This also looks pretty promising, but from my experience, you'll probably have to set up a dedicated machine up for running it... I'm guessing about 7-8 weeks to run it on, also guessing it's about 128gb drive / iso: https://github.com/e-ago/bitcracker These are just guess on the performance though, that I'm basing on previous experiments from scrubbing drives in the past...

So I decided to buy it, since I think 30 bucks is a fair price, even though it might just be a fancy wrapper for the open source bitcracker (I can't be bothered to create my own dictionary files and BitLocker Password is really easy with this).

You could try BitCracker (https://github.com/e-ago/bitcracker) - it is a brute force password attack tool (open source).

The full repo is available at https://github.com/katznboyz1/blender-cuda-subdivision-surface-gpu in case you need access to the full source for more details.

I created a modifier (MOD_gpusubsurf.c) and I want to call a file compiled with NVCC (something like this) inside the MOD.c file. How would I go about linking the MOD .c file and the CUDA .cu file together? I found this on NVIDIA's website, and I believe that it's the right thing; however, I wanted to make sure that this is the right way.