beads-examples VS docs

Source code for the animated solution is on github: https://github.com/magicmouse/beads-examples/blob/master/Advent_of_Code_2021/day02_deluxe.beads

Note that unless I'm very confused, the index.html is the transpiler output rather than human written.

The calculator example here makes rather more sense to me: https://github.com/magicmouse/beads-examples/blob/master/Exa...

they don't let you put two links in, nor can i put in a screenshot. Reddit is a strange beast. Anyway the source is on the website in the SDK at www.beadslang.org, click the "download SDK" button which gives you the full SDK (about 80 MB), there is also a version on Github if you look for the beads source code https://github.com/magicmouse/beads-examples

The interesting semantic relationships are those that let the machine automatically deduce optimizations

> I also like the idea of modifying function definitions at runtime. I have these visions/nightmares of programs that take other programs as input and then let me run experiments on how the program behaves under certain changes to the source code. I want to write metaprograms dammit

Lotta metaprogramming in Joy. Many functions work by building new functions and running them, it's a natural idiom in Joy.

- - - -

> A language designed around having first-class GUI support

Red? ( https://www.red-lang.org/ )

> Visual Interface Dialect ... is a dialect of Red, providing the simplest possible way to specify graphic components with their properties, layouts and even event handlers. VID code is compiled at runtime to a tree of faces suitable for displaying.

https://github.com/red/docs/blob/master/en/gui.adoc

> You can’t work with strings, json, sets, or hash maps very well, date manipulation is terrible, you can barely do combinatorics problems, etc etc etc. I want a language that’s terse for everything.

That also sounds like Red.

> They are well funded.

Rebol Technologies went bankrupt, and Rebol is de-facto dead since more than a decade; Red barely manages to get by thanks to a recent crypto spike.

> I would say the languages are very different in the sense that Beads is clearly aimed at graphical interactive software.

So is Red with it's native GUI engine. [1]

> They are so different that it is hard to compare.

Both share the same goal of replacing modern software practices with biased, batteries-included toolchain, varying only in implementation.

> Red being a concatenative language has more in common with FORTH than Algol.

Red is not concatenative in any sense of the word, nor any other language in Rebol family that I know of.

[1]: https://github.com/red/docs/blob/master/en/view.adoc

> What if a simpler programming language had first-class representations of a lot more than strings and arrays?

Red lang?

> Where most languages have 6-8 base datatypes, Red has almost 50.

https://github.com/red/docs/blob/master/en/datatypes.adoc