bash_kernel VS crystal_kernel

For those who don't know, Jupyter has a bash kernel: https://github.com/takluyver/bash_kernel

And you can run Jupyter notebooks from the CLI with Ploomber: https://github.com/ploomber/ploomber

Something like this? https://github.com/takluyver/bash_kernel

I wrote a Crystal kernel for Jupyter, just a modified bash_kernel, 140 lines of code, but it was tiring because I don't have enough Python ability. icrystal is the widely used Jupyter kernel for Crystal, which uses ICR . On the other hand, this crystal_kernel uses the official crystal interpreter.

Thank you! One of my main goals was making data processing in the command-line more accessible and intuitive. If you use a shell you can leverage an extensive array of tools. please take a look at the recipes in the Readme. The shell is many times underrated for data processing!

Right now you can use it in Jupiter Notebooks using a shell kernel like: https://github.com/takluyver/bash_kernel

On the mid-term, developing a spyql kernel is appealing because of syntax highlighting, code autocompleting, and more. But unless several people show interest on this, I should tackle other features first.

I recently learned of jupyter+bash and it seemed like a step toward rundeck.