babyagi VS awesome-ai-agents

Define agency. Does AutoGPT or BabyAGI fit the definition?

BabyAGI: github.com/yoheinakajima/babyagi

In my opinion the most interesting Agents: Auto-GPT Github: https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT BabyAGI Github: https://github.com/yoheinakajima/babyagi Voyager Github: https://github.com/MineDojo/Voyager / Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16291 I would also add: ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools Github: https://github.com/ur-whitelab/chemcrow-public/ Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05376

People also have been trying to build multi-agent and task-planning systems. MS research in Asia seems to produce decent results with Task Matrix and HuggingGPT. Similar things have been tried in the form of Auto-GPT and BabyAGI , but both projects are setting their goal so high that they may not achieve the at all, and they are likely to see a complete rework when multi-modal solutions become widespread.

Joke's on you, /u/ILoveThisPlace is actually just a bot responding using the BabyAGI script, we've all been had!

BabyAGI AI-Powered Task Management for OpenAI + Pinecone or Llama.cpp

Yes, we haven't seen anything like that yet. But we do see the people trying to build these things (see AutoGPT, babyagi, ChaosGPT, etc) today, and with the last few years of advancement in LLMs they now have the fundamental building blocks to succeed in the near term (say the next 5 years) rather than in some imaginary far future.

You should check out some of the projects that combine LangChain with LLMs to automate this process like BabyAGI (https://github.com/yoheinakajima/babyagi) and AutoGPT (https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT). They were originally designed around ChatGPT models but have expanded to include llamacpp as an alternative. These provide your language models with the ability to save long term memory, a goal-oriented task list and extra functionality like surfing the web and, in some cases, creating and modifying files on disk.

# TODO: Get your Groq AI API key from https://console.groq.com/ GROQ_API_KEY = "" # TODO: Get your E2B API key from https://e2b.dev/docs E2B_API_KEY = "" # Or use 8b version # MODEL_NAME = "llama3-8b-8192" MODEL_NAME = "llama3-70b-8192" SYSTEM_PROMPT = """you are a python data scientist. you are given tasks to complete and you run python code to solve them. - the python code runs in jupyter notebook. - every time you call `execute_python` tool, the python code is executed in a separate cell. it's okay to multiple calls to `execute_python`. - display visualizations using matplotlib or any other visualization library directly in the notebook. don't worry about saving the visualizations to a file. - you have access to the internet and can make api requests. - you also have access to the filesystem and can read/write files. - you can install any pip package (if it exists) if you need to but the usual packages for data analysis are already preinstalled. - you can run any python code you want, everything is running in a secure sandbox environment""" tools = [ { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "execute_python", "description": "Execute python code in a Jupyter notebook cell and returns any result, stdout, stderr, display_data, and error.", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": { "code": { "type": "string", "description": "The python code to execute in a single cell.", } }, "required": ["code"], }, }, } ]

Hey everyone! I'm the CEO of the company that built this SDK.

We're a company called E2B [0]. We're building and open-source [1] secure environments for running untrusted AI-generated code and AI agents. We call these environments sandboxes and they are built on top of micro VM called Firecracker [2].

You can think of us as giving small cloud computers to LLMs.

We recently created a dedicated SDK for building custom code interpreters in Python or JS/TS. We saw this need after a lot of our users have been adding code execution capabilities to their AI apps with our core SDK [3]. These use cases were often centered around AI data analysis so code interpreter-like behavior made sense

The way our code interpret SDK works is by spawning an E2B sandbox with Jupyter Server. We then communicate with this Jupyter server through Jupyter Kernel messaging protocol [4].

We don't do any wrapping around LLM, any prompting, or any agent-like framework. We leave all of that on users. We're really just a boring code execution layer that sats at the bottom that we're building specifically for the future software that will be building another software. We work with any LLM. Here's how we added code interpreter to the new Llama-3 models [5].

Our long-term plan is to build an automated AWS for AI apps and agents.

Happy to answer any questions and hear feedback!

[0] https://e2b.dev/

[1] https://github.com/e2b-dev

[2] https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker

[3] https://e2b.dev/docs

[4] https://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/latest/messaging.ht...

[5] https://github.com/e2b-dev/e2b-cookbook/blob/main/examples/l...

github.com/awesome-ai-agents

Github: https://github.com/e2b-dev/awesome-ai-agents and https://github.com/EmbraceAGI/Awesome-AGI