azure-search-openai-demo VS guidance

Hi all, Im not an expert at full-stack deployments and need help with a sample code from github to which I want to make changes. (Code: https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo) If your suggestion works, I am willing to tip 15$ (please provide link). This Github code is used as frontend for our application. We pretty much want to keep it like it is but make one minor adjustment. If you chat with the model, it gives you citations: (Link). Then on the right side of the page a Analysis Bar opens and it shows the one page that this citation refers to. HERE: We need to show the WHOLE document for each citation instead of just one page. I think it has to do with an url or something that needs to be changed. Could you tell me the script names and changes (before and after) so I can overwrite it? Thanks a lot. Best

There's at least two more. There's also https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo

And you can deploy a chat bot from within the Azure playground which runs on another codebase.

You can see region availability here for Azure OpenAI:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/o...

It's definitely limited, but there's currently more than one region available.

(I happen to be working at the moment on a location-related fix to our most popular Azure OpenAI sample, https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo )

Hello everyone, I am an electrical engineer working at a company, since I’ve been coding for a few months they asked me to implement Ai services in their workflow and I did it following the tutorial by azure to chat with entreprise data provided by Microsoft (https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo) the problem is in only a few days the pricing was indicated to be about 70$ going in too much higher prévision for the rest of the month in the azure cost analysis tool which is too high for us. When I saw that I deleted the ressource group that was created following the tutorial but now I can’t access it to see azure stopped billing us and I’m a little worried. If the ressource group including the cognitive search was deleted the billing stop right (it was cognitive search that costed like 95%) if not how can i see a deleted ressource group and how can I stop the billing?

I recently deployed https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo

You may also want to browse through this sample code base on GitHub https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo. This sounds like what you want to achieve. https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo

You can also use a GPT model combined with a search service to provide a QnA chatbot https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo

This IS Microsoft Guidance, they seem to have spun off a separate GitHub organization for it.

https://github.com/microsoft/guidance redirects to https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance now.

... and it sets the value of "armor" to "leather" so that you can use that value later in your code if you wish to. Guidance is pretty powerful, but I find the grammar hard to work with. I think the idea of being able to upload a bit of code or a context-free grammar to guide the model is super smart.

https://github.com/microsoft/guidance/blob/d2c5e3cbb730e337b...

Here's one thing I don't get.

Why all the rigamarole of hoping you get a valid response, adding last-mile validators to detect invalid responses, trying to beg the model to pretty please give me the syntax I'm asking for...

...when you can guarantee a valid JSON syntax by only sampling tokens that are valid? Instead of greedily picking the highest-scoring token every time, you select the highest-scoring token that conforms to the requested format.

This is what Guidance does already, also from Microsoft: https://github.com/microsoft/guidance

But OpenAI apparently does not expose the full scores of all tokens, it only exposes the highest-scoring token. Which is so odd, because if you run models locally, using Guidance is trivial, and you can guarantee your json is correct every time. It's faster to generate, too!

Perhaps something as simple as stating it was first built around OpenAI models and later expanded to local via plugins?

I've been meaning to ask you, have you seen/used MS Guidance[0] 'language' at all? I don't know if it's the right abstraction to interface as a plugin with what you've got in llm cli but there's a lot about Guidance that seems incredibly useful to local inference [token healing and acceleration especially].

[0]https://github.com/microsoft/guidance

LangChain is just too much, personal solutions are great, until you need to compare metrics or methodologies of prompt generation. Then the onus is on these n-parties who are sharing their resources to ensure that all of them used the same templates, they were generated the same way, with the only diff being the models these prompts were run on.

So maybe a simpler library like Microsoft's Guidance (https://github.com/microsoft/guidance)? It does this really well.

I am unclear on the status of the project but here is the conversation that seem to be tracking it: https://github.com/microsoft/guidance/discussions/201

Let's have a subreddit about Guidance!

You should look at guidance for an LLM to fill out a template. Define the output data structure and provide the real estate listing in the context (see the JSON template example here https://github.com/microsoft/guidance)