awesome-test-automation VS symflower

https://github.com/atinfo/awesome-test-automation/blob/maste...

vcr.py, playback, and rr do [HTTP,] test recording and playback. httprunner can replay HAR. DevTools can save http requests and responses to HAR files.

awesome-web-archiving lists a number of tools that work with WARC; but only har2warc:

I don't have personal experience, but I have this link bookmarked, might help you: https://github.com/atinfo/awesome-test-automation/blob/master/python-test-automation.md

For large projects, simple assert statements aren't enough to adequately write and manage tests. You'll require built-in module unittest or popular third-party modules like pytest. See python test automation frameworks for more resources.

So as we see, there are some caveats when working with Jazzer and custom data types, requiring manual work to supply the fuzzer with the correct test drivers, and being able to understand the generated test values. Symflower on the other hand generated a complete test suite fast and presents easy to understand test cases. However, we are still not done: if you find code that does not work for you or has results that could be done better, please let us know through our public issue tracker.

Full disclosure: I work for this company and we're always very happy to get feedback from our users. What did you like? What did you not like? Did something work well or not at all? You can also open issues on our GitHub. In case you're interested in the magic behind the curtain feel free to check out our website.

Creating unit tests will always involve writing some boiler-plate code. That's where editor extensions come in handy. The Symflower Visual Studio Code extension allows you to generate tests in the above unit test style, and even maintain them. Please drop us a line on our public issue tracker if you are missing a feature, found a bug or just want to tell us how you like the extension and the unit test style.