awesome-oss-alternatives VS xg2xg

I see that you said github repo, but my life experience has been that those "awesome" style repos are committed to once and then ignore all pull requests or issues going forward. Thus, I think the audience would be better served by AlternativeTo or one of its ilk, which offers a licensing filter on their lists (e.g. https://alternativeto.net/software/github/?license=opensourc... )

But, a quick search for alternative coughed up a few results, which exhibit the behavior I described https://github.com/RunaCapital/awesome-oss-alternatives#awes... https://github.com/btw-so/open-source-alternatives?tab=readm...

One may also find more via topic exploration, e.g. https://github.com/topics/alternatives

Yeah, although I've always found the criteria of this list strange (In particular the requirement to be a for-profit startup) and their categorization of open source is not clear as reflected in this issue I opened.

I've called them out on it here and here before.

An awesome list of alternatives to commercial software build by OSS developers and startups, collected Igor Kotua on GitHub: https://github.com/RunaCapital/awesome-oss-alternatives opensource startups

They also maintain and "Awesome-OSS-Alternatives" list to which I questioned many entries within.

What about Mendel and Streamz? I don't see those in https://github.com/jhuangtw/xg2xg

Infact most of the tech stack that the world uses is also used by these companies but in the form of internal tools so I don't think there should be a problem switching. Here is an example for Google https://github.com/jhuangtw/xg2xg

Was able to find it yes :) https://github.com/jhuangtw/xg2xg

Google first did their monorepo presentation back in 2015. Also, look at xg2xg to understand how much customize internal tooling Google has.

Tools could be anything like Unix command line tools, build tools, frameworks, other libraries, or some of the larger pieces of infrastructure like those listed at xg2xg.