autopep8 VS pylama

AutoPEP8: This tool automatically formats Python code to conform to the PEP 8 style guide. It uses pycodestyle, a library that encapsulates the functionality of the original pep8 tool.

autopep8

I found three, code-formatting tools when looking at that for IDE's: autopep8; black; yapf. One or more might be able to automatically fix those problems. They might also have an API or command line call for it where you could add it in your pipeline: prompt -> response -> code formatter -> formatted response.

autopep8

Your code isn't PEP-8 compliant. Use black or autopep8 on your code to auto-format your code, or at least use pylint to check for issues, before asking anyone else to read your code.

Is there a tool that automatically styles Julia code according to some style guide similar to autopep8 in Python (https://pypi.org/project/autopep8/) or styler in R (https://www.tidyverse.org/blog/2017/12/styler-1.0.0/)?

I use autopep8 most of the time, but it does not even attempt to split these long conditionals. 😅

Pylama is a code audit tool for Python that wraps tools like Pylint, pycodestyle, PyFlakes, McCabe, and others to provide a unified interface.

Use a code linter. And potentially use black.

Use a linter like pylama

Lint your code. I recommend pylama.

Linters analyze code to detect various categories of issues like logistical issue and stylistic issues. Some popular linters are Pylint, pycodestyle, Flake8 and Pylama.