asyncly
runtimelab
asyncly | runtimelab | |
---|---|---|
2 | 54 | |
27 | 1,342 | |
- | 1.4% | |
5.0 | 4.6 | |
29 days ago | 6 days ago | |
C++ | ||
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
asyncly
-
Why choose async/await over threads?
One of the main benefits of async/await in Rust is that it can work in situations where you don't even have threads or dynamic memory. You can absolutely use it to write very concise code that's waiting on an interrupt on your microcontroller to have read some data coming in over I2C from some buffer. It's a higher level abstraction that allows your code to use concurrency (mostly) without having tons of interactions with the underlying runtime.
Every major piece of software that I have worked on has implemented this in one form or another (even in non-modern C++ where you don't have any coroutine concepts, Apple's grand central dispatch,). If you don't then your business logic will either be very imperformantly block on IO, have a gazillion of threads that make development/debugging a living hell, or be littered with implementation details of the underlying runtime or a combination of all 3.
If you don't use existing abstractions in the language (or through some library), you will end up building them yourselves, which is hard and probably overall inferior to widely used ones (if there are any). I have done so in the past, see https://github.com/goto-opensource/asyncly.
-
David Mazieres' tutorial and take on C++20 coroutines
Keep in mind that these is a really basic building block where you can bring your own runtime and hook coroutines into it, not something that is at all usable out of the box. This is exacerbated by the fact that the C++ standard library is still lacking support for non-blocking futures/promises.
To see how it can be used for actual asynchronous operations on a thread pool, take a look at asyncly, which I co-authored:
https://github.com/LogMeIn/asyncly/blob/master/Test/Unit/fut...
runtimelab
- Green Thread Experiment in .NET
-
Is .NET just miles ahead or am I delusional?
There was a "green thread" experiment for dotnet a while ago, here is the conclusion: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
-
Why choose async/await over threads?
Experiment result write-up: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/e69dda51c7d796b812...
TLDR: The green threads experiment was a failure as it found (expected and obvious) issues that the Java applications are now getting to enjoy, joining their Go colleagues, while also requiring breaking changes. It, however, gave inspiration to subsequent re-examination of current async/await implementation and whether it can be improved by moving state machine generation and execution away from IL completely to runtime. It was a massive success as evidenced by preliminary overhead estimations in the results.
-
Garnet – A new remote cache-store from Microsoft Research
Yeah, it kind of is. There are quite a few of experiments that are conducted to see if they show promise in the prototype form and then are taken further for proper integration if they do.
Unfortunately, object stack allocation was not one of them even though DOTNET_JitObjectStackAllocation configuration knob exists today, enabling it makes zero impact as it almost never kicks in. By the end of the experiment[0], it was concluded that before investing effort in this kind of feature becomes profitable given how a lot of C# code is written, there are many other lower hanging fruits.
To contrast this, in continuation to green threads experiment, a runtime handled tasks experiment[1] which moves async state machine handling from IL emitted by Roslyn to special-cased methods and then handling purely in runtime code has been a massive success and is now being worked on to be integrated in one of the future version of .NET (hopefully 10?)
[0] https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/11192
[1] https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/async2-exp...
-
Java virtual threads hit with pinning issue
Unlike these folks from dotnet, which tested directly on ASP for real workload
https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398?darkschemeovr=1
-
Ask HN: Do we have evidence that green threading is faster than OS threads?
[1] https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
-
JEP Draft – Derived Record Creation (Preview) – Java
The only way to avoid it is to not build on top of Java or not adding any features on top of Java.
> To give another example with C#, there has been a lot of recent discussion about finding potential alternatives to their async-await concurrency model. They cite the level of effort it takes to maintain the async await style code and the costs that come from this.
I had a very different take-away. They did PoC with virtual threads and decided it's not worth the switch now and async-await that they have is good enough.
https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
> Some of the languages it gets compared too aren't even that old yet.
C# is old enough to drink and Scala just had its 20th birthday this week :)
-
.NET 8 – .NET Blog
It was tried and the dotnet team decided to drop it: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
-
.NET Green Thread Experiment Results
Technical details here: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/green-thre...
-
Thread-per-Core
Just last month .NET ended a green threading experiment, mainly because the overhead it adds to FFI was too high:
https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
Rust had green threads until late 2014, and they were removed because of their impact on performance.
Everyone has done the basic research: green threading is a convenient abstraction that comes with certain performance trade offs. It doesn't work for the kind of profile that Rust is trying to target.
What are some alternatives?
C-Coroutines - Coroutines for C.
.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.
cppcoro - A library of C++ coroutine abstractions for the coroutines TS
DNNE - Prototype native exports for a .NET Assembly.
coro-chat - Playing with the C++17 Coroutines TS to implement a simple chat server
.NET-Obfuscator - Lists of .NET Obfuscator (Free, Freemium, Paid and Open Source )
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
csharplang - The official repo for the design of the C# programming language
Cocona - Micro-framework for .NET console application. Cocona makes it easy and fast to build console applications on .NET.
CoreWCF - Main repository for the Core WCF project
Flee - Fast Lightweight Expression Evaluator
Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI) - .NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.