asv
local-code-review
| asv | local-code-review | |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | |
| 840 | 3 | |
| 1.1% | - | |
| 9.1 | 5.5 | |
| 9 days ago | 9 months ago | |
| Python | Shell | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
asv
-
git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
> All these workflows are a derivation of the source in the repository and keeping them close together has a great aesthetic.
I agree. Version control is a great enabler, so using it to track "sources" other than just code can be useful. A couple of tools I like to use:
- Artemis, for tracking issues http://www.chriswarbo.net/blog/2017-06-14-artemis.html
- ASV, for tracking benchmark results https://github.com/airspeed-velocity/asv (I use this for non-Python projects via my asv-nix plugin http://www.chriswarbo.net/projects/nixos/asv_benchmarking.ht... )
-
Is GitHub Actions suitable for running benchmarks?
scikit-image, the project that commissioned this task, uses Airspeed Velocity, or asv, for their benchmark tests.
-
Memory benchmarking tools
Problem - The project currently uses Airspeed Velocity for tracking the memory changes. But I am having a lot of trouble setting this up and using this tool for monitoring memory consumption on a regular basis. Are you guys aware of some other open-source tools that I can use instead of this? I am stuck with this thing for some time now. I would appreciate any help.
local-code-review
-
git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
Here's a script I use for this. It's designed for use with github. Run it in your copy of a repo with a PR number and it will create a 'review' branch that has the changes uncommitted. Works great with IDEs with a good diff experience.
https://github.com/whenceforth/local-code-review
What are some alternatives?
pyperformance - Python Performance Benchmark Suite
git-appraise - Distributed code review system for Git repos
pybench - Python benchmark tool inspired by Geekbench.
git-appraise-web - Web UI for git-appraise
scikit-image - Image processing in Python
git-issues - A distributed issue tracking system based on Git repositories, written in Python
fashion-mnist - A MNIST-like fashion product database. Benchmark :point_down:
prr - Mailing list style code reviews for github
pyeventbus - Python Eventbus
git-bug - Distributed, offline-first bug tracker embedded in git, with bridges
pytest-benchmark - py.test fixture for benchmarking code
git-appraise-eclipse - Distributed code review for Eclipse