appium-desktop
Quick
appium-desktop | Quick | |
---|---|---|
6 | 3 | |
4,514 | 9,764 | |
- | 0.2% | |
5.2 | 8.0 | |
about 1 year ago | 26 days ago | |
JavaScript | Swift | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
appium-desktop
-
Automating Mobile Web Browsers with Appium
The first thing you can do when investigating a novel app without source code or accessibility IDs is to use Appium Desktop – a nice front end for Appium with a built-in inspector.
-
How to Efficiently Test iOS Apps with Appium on WeTest
Appium can be installed via Appium Desktop ( releases page ) or via npm. We use the latter one
-
Simplest way to Automatic test your React Native app with Appium
Come here and get yoursefl a desktop version of Appium .
-
Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
Now, download Appium Desktop from this link.
-
The Painful Parts of End-to-End Test Automation for your Windows Application
Appium Desktop
-
Appium Running On Apple Silicon M1
https://github.com/appium/appium-desktop/issues/1617#issuecomment-743827892
Quick
-
GitHub can't be trusted. Or, how suspending Russian accounts deleted project history and pull requests
Take this example mentioned in the blog post. It was merged into Quick:main from younata:fix_parallel_tests - until the PR was merged, the code resided in the user younata's profile. That's the point of PRs, right? It can't be merged into Quick unless it passes review and is merged. Therefore, when the (allegedly) Russian user's profile was removed it removed all of the commits on their profile - including anything un-merged. Anything already merged, and thus merged to the Quick project repository, has not been changed.
-
Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
These tests are responsible for validating that a single unit is working properly. You can think of a unit as a class or function. These tests are written in an isolated fashion. I mean, if the rest of the system is full of bugs and nothing else work, if this unit work, the test will pass. They are also repeatable. They don't depend on anything else, really. Anytime you run the test, if the code hasn't changed, the test will report the same result. These tests are intimately related to the code quality of your project. If your code is clean, these tests should be relatively easy to write. When writing unit tests in iOS, you usually use XCTest or Quick
- Quick – behavior-driven development framework for Swift and Objective-C
What are some alternatives?
WinAppDriver - Windows Application Driver
OHHTTPStubs - Stub your network requests easily! Test your apps with fake network data and custom response time, response code and headers!
WebdriverIO - Next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js
Mockingbird - A Swifty mocking framework for Swift and Objective-C.
appium - Cross-platform automation framework for all kinds of your apps built on top of W3C WebDriver protocol
Nimble - A Matcher Framework for Swift and Objective-C
WebDriverAgent - A WebDriver server for iOS and tvOS
Kiwi - Simple BDD for iOS
WeTest-automated-testing - A full-scale testing platform for each stage of your development and operations lifecycle.
SwiftyMocky - Framework for automatic mock generation. Adds a set of handy methods, simplifying testing. One of the best and most complete solutions, including generics support and much more.
Google Test - GoogleTest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework
Sleipnir - BDD-style framework for Swift