ansible-json-monitor VS exa

Along the same lines, I also learned recently about ansible-json-monitor which saves results to a json file instead of asciidoc.

ajmon together with ansible with the JSON output callback to probe the results of playbooks on the command-line. Much easier the the huge web monstrosities for monitoring ansible runs and also useful with just single machine runs.

I think they are not referring to ls, but to exa [0], which is not maintained anymore.

[0]https://github.com/ogham/exa

I would also take a look at exa: https://the.exa.website/

It's been my ls replacement for a while now and it's very customizable!

It depends on the scale of the project but man, if you can't build a simple CRUD app in your preferred stack and deploy it in some fashion (even if it's just a binary posted on some website, kinda like Exa) then that's just disappointing...

Can compile to a single binary to build tools like exa

Try https://github.com/ogham/exa and exa -T -L2 command . It will generate a good folder structure tree to update the question

Some of us don't want all of GNU's utilities; just on an as-needed basis. They're not as needed as they once were.

Many of these utilities have been rewritten in Rust and have more modern features.

For example, instead of ls, I use exa [1]. Or ripgrep [2] instead of grep.

[1]: https://github.com/ogham/exa

[2]: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep

fish: A very fast shell with various customization options to streamline daily commands. I discovered it through this post by @caarlos0, where he provides more details about performance and the differences between fish and zsh. Additionally, I use some CLI utilities like delta, exa, and ripgrep. Here's my dotfiles for fish.