squid VS DotNet-ORM-Cookbook

Compare squid vs DotNet-ORM-Cookbook and see what are their differences.

squid

🦑 Provides SQL tagged template strings and schema definition functions. (by andywer)

DotNet-ORM-Cookbook

This repository is meant to show how to perform common tasks using C# with variety of ORMs. (by TortugaResearch)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
squid DotNet-ORM-Cookbook
2 9
130 334
- 0.9%
0.0 0.0
about 1 year ago almost 2 years ago
TypeScript C#
MIT License The Unlicense
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

squid

Posts with mentions or reviews of squid. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-29.
  • Don't use your ORM entities for everything – embrace the SQL
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Mar 2024
    I guess I failed to set the context correctly given that you presented solutions for Clojure and Python, where it isn't as much of a problem since from the start the language fails to provide compiler guarantees you usually come to expect out of a SQL driver wrapper in typed languages (even though Clojure macros are probably powerful enough to allow this).

    As a comparison, DX-wise this is no safer and is indeed very similar to the usual idiom in Go for example, where you just concatenate (pre-interpolated) SQL strings. But when you actually want the compiler to prove the correctness of your queries even in a rudimentary way, these .sql file solutions usually (if not, everytime) fail to provide the necessary external checker that processes templates and uses an accurate model of your database and SQL to verify that all used combinations make sense.

    The closest thing to a proper take on this I've seen is https://github.com/andywer/squid with https://github.com/andywer/postguard which, although the SQL is inlined in the code, it uses the right approach for verifying correctness as far as I could tell in the little time I experimented with it.

  • "ORMs have a special place in my heart, not entirely unlike Brutus and Caesar: a dear friend who betrays you and leaves you to die a slow, painful death." – Taming SQL and ORMs with sqlc
    6 projects | /r/programming | 1 May 2022
    For typescript and javascript, there's also squid + its companion project, postguard: https://github.com/andywer/squid

DotNet-ORM-Cookbook

Posts with mentions or reviews of DotNet-ORM-Cookbook. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-06.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing squid and DotNet-ORM-Cookbook you can also consider the following projects:

ship-hold - data access framework for Postgresql on nodejs

Entity Framework - EF Core is a modern object-database mapper for .NET. It supports LINQ queries, change tracking, updates, and schema migrations.

trilogy - TypeScript SQLite layer with support for both native C++ & pure JavaScript drivers.

SQLDelight - SQLDelight - Generates typesafe Kotlin APIs from SQL

stackql-middleware - Middleware solution to allow clients to query back end APIs using SQL

DataAccessGeneration - Better SQL Server stored procedure calls from C#

Sequel - Sequel: The Database Toolkit for Ruby

Tortuga Chain - A fluent ORM for .NET