amphtml VS web-bugs

https://amp.dev/ is that. No one wants to use it because the very first line of the mandatory js file is about advertising metrics.

Google announced an open source HTML framework called AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) for better and faster experiences on the mobile web (Google said that) in 2015. This was created in an effort to play against Facebook Instant Articles.

Does Flutter web allow for AMP compatibility?

Without disclosing too much, I am fairly involved around this topic, and I would say it's definitely heading for deprecation this year. The key giveaway is that Google Analytics 3 will be shutting down in July[0] and AMP has made no progress towards supporting Google Analytics 4[1]. I think it'll be deprecated at first rather than shut down because there are still billions of AMP documents floating around the web.

[0] https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/11583528?hl=en

[1] https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/24621

Accelerated Mobile Page is a Google-backed open-source project that allows you to create fast-loading super mobile-friendly pages.

OK, so we've all probably heard about AMP HTML from Google by now.

No JavaScript will be allowed other than an off-the-shelf AMP library

Recently I came across the AMP website at https://amp.dev/ (after some years since first seeing it). It’s really remarkable how much Google wants to pretend this is an industry standard and not their own little fiefdom. I don’t see the word Google anywhere, not even on the About page.

More about AMP

The thread is very long, here is the relevant comment:

https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/131916#issuecom...

https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%...

Microsoft Teams (which I don't think many people use voluntarily) in particular breaks in stupid ways - and then in others if you spoof your user agent.

a link to the video would help with troubleshooting, seems like another case of "this site or this particular feature doesn't support firefox" otherwise report to https://webcompat.com/

Have any of you faced this? If the website is made to open only in chromium-based browsers, I am planning to report to Webcompat. But before that, I thought I would make sure from others. Any experience or quick fix would be appreciated.

Teams was a classic hellhole for me when I was using Linux. Nowadays it lets you in but Firefox genuinely doesn't support all of the features the Teams site uses. This means certain features are made unavailable to Firefox users. Forcing the user agent makes some of these partially work but they are also still broken so Mozilla doesn't want to enable a user agent override by default and Microsoft doesn't want to enable a feature that only half works.

This GitHub WebCompat issue serves as a good example history https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/77892

https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/125920#issuecom...

having recently looked at a firefox performance regression for filing a bugreport, tooling that tracks performance (quite publicly) sees attention, easy upload to share tracing profiles also helps: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/testing/perfdocs/ind...

Their dedicated blog keeps you posted if firefox perf is your interest https://blog.mozilla.org/performance/

If you have a particular website you notice chromium being significantly faster with, for an easy report, there's https://webcompat.com/ - though bugzilla is better than it seems when coming from github issues