acme-dns-certbot-joohoi VS mkcert

Compare acme-dns-certbot-joohoi vs mkcert and see what are their differences.

mkcert

A simple zero-config tool to make locally trusted development certificates with any names you'd like. (by FiloSottile)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
acme-dns-certbot-joohoi mkcert
3 132
208 45,988
- -
0.0 2.7
16 days ago about 1 month ago
Python Go
MIT License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

acme-dns-certbot-joohoi

Posts with mentions or reviews of acme-dns-certbot-joohoi. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-21.
  • Is it okay to use letsencrypt for internet facing websites? I was going to buy a digicert cert. what's the downsides to letsencrypt vs paid public CAs?
    1 project | /r/webdev | 20 Apr 2022
    Check this out https://github.com/joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi
  • my solution to domain, certificates, ports etc (zero cost and no external server or third-party service needed)
    2 projects | /r/selfhosted | 21 Feb 2022
    we can use tool such as certbot to get certificates from let's encrypt (in traditional way). and to get one using DNS-01 challenge you can use something like acme-dns-certbot. even further the addition of TXT DNS record can be automated using a provider (in our case duckdns) specific tool/plugin for example certbot_dns_duckdns
  • Ask HN: What's your solution for SSL on internal servers?
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Feb 2022
    DNS alias mode:

    * https://dan.langille.org/2019/02/01/acme-domain-alias-mode/

    * https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/wiki/DNS-alias-mo...

    * https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/technical-deep-dive-se...

    You want the name "internal.example.com". In your external DNS you create a CNAME from "_acme-challenge.internal.example.com" and point it to (e.g.) "internal.example.net" or "internal.dns-auth.example.com"

    When you request the certificate you specify the "dns-01" method. The issuer (e.g., LE) will go to the the external DNS server for the look up, see that it is a CNAME and then follow the CNAME/alias, and do the verification at the final hostname.

    So your ACME client has to do a DNS (TXT) record update, which can often be done via various APIs, e.g.:

    * https://github.com/AnalogJ/lexicon

    You can even run your own DNS server locally (in a DMZ?) if your DNS provider does not have an convenient API. There are servers written for this use case:

    * https://github.com/joohoi/acme-dns

    * https://github.com/joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi

    * https://github.com/pawitp/acme-dns-server

mkcert

Posts with mentions or reviews of mkcert. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-29.
  • HTTPS on Localhost with Next.js
    3 projects | dev.to | 29 Apr 2024
    The experimental HTTPS flag relies on mkcert, designed for a single development system. If you run a Docker container, the flag won’t configure your local browser to trust its certificate.
  • Mkcert: Simple zero-config tool to make locally trusted development certificates
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Apr 2024
  • Mkcert: Simple tool to make locally trusted dev certificates names you'd like
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Mar 2024
  • You Can't Follow Me
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Jan 2024
    The author mentions difficulties with HTTPS and trying stuff locally.

    I've had some success with mkcert [1] to easily create certificates trusted by browsers, I can suggest to look into this. You are your own root CA, I think it can work without an internet connection.

    [1] https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert/

  • SSL Certificates for Home Network
    1 project | /r/homelab | 7 Dec 2023
  • Simplifying Localhost HTTPS Setup with mkcert and stunnel
    1 project | dev.to | 27 Nov 2023
    Solution: mkcert – Your Zero-Configuration HTTPS Enabler Meet mkcert, a user-friendly, zero-configuration tool designed for creating locally-trusted development certificates. Find it on its GitHub page and follow the instructions tailored for your operating system. For Mac users employing Homebrew, simply execute the following commands in your terminal:
  • 10 reasons you should quit your HTTP client
    5 projects | dev.to | 15 Nov 2023
    Well, Certifi does not ship with your company's certificates! So requesting internal services may come with additional painful extra steps! Also for a local development environment that uses mkcert for example!
  • Show HN: Anchor – developer-friendly private CAs for internal TLS
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Nov 2023
    My project, getlocalcert.net[1] may be the one you're thinking of.

    Since I'm also building in this space, I'll give my perspective. Local certificate generation is complicated. If you spend the time, you can figure it out, but it's begging for a simpler solution. You can use tools like mkcert[2] for anything that's local to your machine. However, if you're already using ACME in production, maybe you'd prefer to use ACME locally? I think that's what Anchor offers, a unified approach.

    There's a couple references in the Anchor blog about solving the distribution problem by building better tooling[3]. I'm eager to learn more, that's a tough nut to crack. My theory for getlocalcert is that the distribution problem is too difficult (for me) to solve, so I layer the tool on top of Let's Encrypt certificates instead. The end result for both tools is a trusted TLS certificate issued via ACME automation.

    1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36674224

    2. https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert

    3. https://blog.anchor.dev/the-acme-gap-introducing-anchor-part...

  • Running one’s own root Certificate Authority in 2023
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Sep 2023
    Looks like step-ca/step-cli [1] and mkcert [2] have been mentioned. Another related tool is XCA [3] - a gui tool to manage CAs and server/client TLS certificates. It takes off some of the tedium in using openssl cli directly. It also stores the certs and keys in an encrypted database. It doesn't solve the problem of getting the root CA certificate into the system store or of hosting the revocation list. I use XCA to create and store the root CA. Intermediate CAs signed with it are passed to other issuers like vault and step-issuer.

    [1] https://smallstep.com/docs/step-ca/

    [2] https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert

    [3] https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/

  • Show HN: Local development with .local domains and HTTPS
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Aug 2023
    We use mkcert for this, it works wonderfully.

    https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert