ZeroNet VS planif

our views on the project are incompatible. i consider it harmful to the community to: - advertise fork as official continuation (the worst parts of this were eventually removed, but the project's website still completely mimics official and there's no indication it's a fork anywhere - ship binaries presumably made out of builds made by disappeared nofish - copypaste changes without attribution

Or Zeronet (which is public): https://zeronet.dev/

Forks are currently active, one is maintained by me as ZeroNetX, https://zeronet.dev

More on How ZeroNet Works at https://zeronet.dev

Yep :) https://zeronet.dev/

https://www.whonix.org/wiki/ZeroNet contains information of the project before its original developer disappeared and the forks emerged . as a lead developer of one of the forks i don't want to edit the page myself , lest someone paint me unobjective , but the page needs to cover the changes and security implications . feel free to drop by on https://reddit.com/r/zeronet or discuss things on gh directly with fork devs : - https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy - https://github.com/ZeroNetX/ZeroNet

It seems a good project in early stages. Have you heard about ZeroNet? What do you think about this? And how Locutus is different from Zeronet?

ZeroNetX - by @pramukesh/@canewsin (github), https://github.com/canewsin/ZeroNet, https://zeronet.dev Second fork, i've no idea why it happened (possibly absence of @geekless? i wasn't around and didn't follow how events developed, but they were still around the internets around that time (and then i couldn't contact them any longer))

The library is on crates.io and github.

Fix bugs and stabilise planif, a builder pattern wrapper around the badly documented and not very rust-like windows-rs Task Scheduler API.

You can see this pattern on github. Be warned that I'm still pretty new at rust so some things can probably be improved.