YaLM-100B VS PaLM-rlhf-pytorch

Its probably just open source software/training sets repurposed... https://github.com/yandex/YaLM-100B

There is a 100b model published on pache 2.0 license. Though there is no information about finetuning it or using in 4-bit with smth like llama.cpp. Trying to figure out how to try it without renting extremely expensive gpu set. https://github.com/yandex/YaLM-100B

Hey everyone! I just discovered an open-source 100 billion parameter language model called YaLM, which is published under the Apache 2.0 license. The model is trained on more than 1 TB of Russian and English text. Here's the GitHub repo: https://github.com/yandex/YaLM-100B and an article explaining how it was trained: https://medium.com/yandex/yandex-publishes-yalm-100b-its-the-largest-gpt-like-neural-network-in-open-source-d1df53d0e9a6

Yandex has already released a LLM: https://github.com/yandex/YaLM-100B

So there is this open project YaLM 100B require 200 GB of disk space, it is trained on 1.7 TB of text

You'd think so, but to train a model like the one CAI uses, it would require truly jaw-breaking amount of funds. That's why CAI is so suspicious tbh. Just to give you an example, YaML (100 billion parameters which is probably less than CAI) took 65 days to train, and 800 A100 graphics cards. 175 billion parameters would not be 1.75 times higher because it's not a linear function. It would probably be 10x or even more. IIRC, "Open"Ai could only afford to train GPT-3 a single time...

I don't much follow AI news beyond what I randomly happen to see on HN, but this might still be the largest open source model: https://github.com/yandex/YaLM-100B . There's discussion of it here: https://old.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/vpn0r1/d_h... - at the bottom of that page is a comment from someone who actually ran it in the cloud.

Hilariously, Yandex Alisa runs circles around it, because it's not just a collection of gimmicks but has an actual 100B-class language model (YaLM, opensourced) as its core, plus lots of decent engineering. It's helpful, skillful and feels alive, almost like ChatGPT.

ChatGPT isn't open sourced so we don't know what the actual implementation is. I think you can read Open Assistant's source code for application design. If that is too much, try Open Chat Toolkit's source code for developer tools . If you need very bare implementation, you should go for lucidrains/PaLM-rlhf-pytorch.

AFAIK, it is not. They are using the open-source re-implementation of Phil Wang (aka lucidrains), which is available here: https://github.com/lucidrains/PaLM-rlhf-pytorch

Not sure what do you mean by putting source code in double quote, but I don't think the source code is petabytes of text. GPT-2 implementation is few hundred lines of Python (in HuggingFace). PaLM + RLHF - Pytorch (Basically ChatGPT but with PaLM) is less than 1000 lines.

GitHub Link: https://github.com/lucidrains/PaLM-rlhf-pytorch

Well... Not necessarily. Actually, if you want to be extra thrifty, you could even go without an ML expert. Just use an open-source one, like LaMDA or PaLM. After that, use chatGPT to build you a basic front end (which would still be better than CAI lol).

and PaLM with RLHF from Phil Wang (open model, needs to be trained): https://github.com/lucidrains/PaLM-rlhf-pytorch

Closest you can get is probably with Google T5-Flan [1].

It is not the size of the model or the text it was trained on that makes ChatGPT so performant. It is the additional human assisted training to make it respond well to instructions. Open source versions of that are just starting to see the light of day [2].

[1] https://huggingface.co/google/flan-t5-xxl

[2] https://github.com/lucidrains/PaLM-rlhf-pytorch