WizardLM VS llm

This is interesting work, and a good contribution, but there is no need to mislead people.

[1] https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM

If you pair this with the latest WizardCoder models, which have a fairly better performance than the standard Salesforce Codegen2 and Codegen2.5, you have a pretty solid alternative to GitHub Copilot that runs completely locally.

(We will update the demo links in our github.)

In terms of speed, we're talking about 140t/s for 7B models, and 40t/s for 33B models on a 3090/4090 now.[1] (1 token ~= 0.75 word) It's quite zippy. llama.cpp performs close on Nvidia GPUs now (but they don't have a handy chart) and you can get decent performance on 13B models on M1/M2 Macs.

You can take a look at a list of evals here: https://llm-tracker.info/books/evals/page/list-of-evals - for general usage, I think home-rolled evals like llm-jeopardy [2] and local-llm-comparison [3] by hobbyists are more useful than most of the benchmark rankings.

That being said, personally I mostly use GPT-4 for code assistance to that's what I'm most interested in, and the latest code assistants are scoring quite well: https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval - a recent replit-3b fine tune the human-eval results for open models (as a point of reference, GPT-3.5 gets 60.4 on pass@1 and 68.9 on pass@10 [4]) - I've only just started playing around with it since replit model tooling is not as good as llamas (doc here: https://llm-tracker.info/books/howto-guides/page/replit-mode...).

I'm interested in potentially applying reflexion or some of the other techniques that have been tried to even further increase coding abilities. (InterCode in particular has caught my eye https://intercode-benchmark.github.io/)

[1] https://github.com/turboderp/exllama#results-so-far

[2] https://github.com/aigoopy/llm-jeopardy

[3] https://github.com/Troyanovsky/Local-LLM-comparison/tree/mai...

[4] https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder

You talking about this? https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM

The smallest model that is close to competent at code is WizardCoder 15B.. https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/

WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct (https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder)

We're open-sourcing a project that lets you build simple automations/agent workflows that use LLMs for different tasks. Kinda like Zapier or IFTTT but focused on using natural language to accomplish your tasks.It's super early but we'd love to start getting feedback to steer it in the right direction. It currently supports OpenAI and local models through llm.

> Tensorflow is a C++ framework that has Python bindings and a Python library, but when the models are served they are running on C++

Sure, and it's only a simple 20 step process that involves building Tensorflow from source. Yeay!

https://medium.com/@hamedmp/exporting-trained-tensorflow-mod...

Let me see what the process for compiling a LLM written in Rust is....

https://github.com/rustformers/llm

    cargo install llm-cli

Floneum is a graph editor for local AI workflows. It uses llm to run large language models locally, egui, and dioxus for the frontend, and wasmtime for the plugin system. If you are interested in the project, consider joining the discord, or building a plugin for Floneum in rust using WASI

Run inference for Large Language Models on CPU, with Rust (https://github.com/rustformers/llm)

On the rustformers github page I see that one of the commands to generate the answer is llm llama infer -m ggml-gpt4all-j-v1.3-groovy.bin -p "Rust is a cool programming language because", my basic idea for now is to change the Tauri app to let it do -p prompt, which receives from my code through the link or through a shared variable (if I don't use the link and start different times your app)

wonnx has done some fantastic work in this regard, so that's where we plan to start once we get there. In terms of general discussion of alternate backends, see this issue.