WirtBot VS quadlet

I have built https://b-m-f.github.io/WirtBot/ for this use case.

I wrote and maintain https://github.com/b-m-f/WirtBot .

Personally I use this together with https://github.com/b-m-f/WirtBot/ for keeping everything maintained, but `wg-pod` works with any `wg-quick` compatible config.

As for now, i am confused with this software. I'm glad I'm not the only one. ))) https://github.com/b-m-f/WirtBot/issues/112

its been almost a year since I first started working on WirtBot.

I have also built https://github.com/b-m-f/WirtBot to make the setup even easier. But this will introduce a third Node that is purely routing traffic, which might be overkill depending on your technical expertise.

I know this is solved-- but you should totally check out Quadlet, whch could handle some of the heavy lifting here: https://github.com/containers/quadlet

Thanks. You may want to check out quadlet for a simpler unit file.

There's also quadlet

This generator has even better systemd integration: https://github.com/containers/quadlet

If you're open to going the container route, quadlet is pretty slick: https://github.com/containers/quadlet

It suuposed to be used with https://github.com/containers/quadlet (a systemd generator for podman containers) and of course podman to spawn the containers and then uses a technique similar to https://www.wireguard.com/netns/ in order to give the containers access to the network.

By default, both. You can set the host user independently with HostUser=. See this documentation on the .container file format.